Richards Carol L, Malouin Francine, Nadeau Sylvie, Fung Joyce, D'Amours Line, Perez Claire, Durand Anne
Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City.
Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale.
Physiother Can. 2019 Winter;71(1):43-55. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2017-41.
This study describes the development of a standardized assessment toolkit (SAT) and associated clinical database focusing on sensorimotor rehabilitation in three stroke rehabilitation units (SRUs). Implementation of the SAT was confirmed using objective measures of clinician adherence while exploring reasons for varied adherence. Participants were patients post-stroke admitted for inpatient rehabilitation and clinicians from the three SRUs. A collaborative and iterative process was used to develop the SAT. Implementation was measured by clinician adherence, which was charted by means of assessment entries in patient records and transferred to the clinical database. Reasons for lower adherence were interpreted from therapist data logs at one SRU. The SAT consisted of 25 assessment tools. Clinician adherence to a subset of the tools ranged from 33% to 99% at admission and from 28% to 94% at discharge. At one site, lower adherence among the tools was explained by patient-related factors (1%-36%) and protocol or logistical reasons (0%-7%) at admission; missing data ranged from 0% to 3%, except for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (17%). In this pragmatic study, objective measures of clinician adherence demonstrated the feasibility of implementing an SAT in daily practice. Moreover, the reasons for lower adherence rates may be related to the patients, protocol, and logistics, all of which may vary with the assessment tool, rather than clinician compliance.
本研究描述了一种标准化评估工具包(SAT)及相关临床数据库的开发,该工具包和数据库聚焦于三个中风康复单元(SRU)的感觉运动康复。在探索不同依从性原因的同时,通过临床医生依从性的客观指标证实了SAT的实施情况。参与者为入住住院康复科的中风后患者以及来自三个SRU的临床医生。采用协作和迭代的过程来开发SAT。通过临床医生的依从性来衡量实施情况,依从性通过患者记录中的评估条目进行记录,并传输到临床数据库。从一个SRU的治疗师数据日志中解读依从性较低的原因。SAT由25种评估工具组成。临床医生对部分工具的依从性在入院时为33%至99%,出院时为28%至94%。在一个地点,入院时工具依从性较低的原因可由患者相关因素(1%至36%)和方案或后勤原因(0%至7%)解释;除蒙特利尔认知评估(17%)外,缺失数据范围为0%至3%。在这项实用性研究中,临床医生依从性的客观指标证明了在日常实践中实施SAT的可行性。此外,依从率较低的原因可能与患者、方案和后勤有关,所有这些因素可能因评估工具而异,而非临床医生的依从性。