• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双性恋和女同性恋者家庭健康史知识的差异。

Differences in Family Health History Knowledge Among Bisexual and Lesbian Women.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

出版信息

LGBT Health. 2019 Apr;6(3):134-137. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2018.0217. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1089/lgbt.2018.0217
PMID:30789301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6477583/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine whether there are differences between sexual minority women and heterosexual women in family health history knowledge.

METHODS

We used data from Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation's The Health of Women Study. We included women who completed two of six online surveys between 2012 and 2015 (n = 22,410).

RESULTS

Compared with heterosexual women, bisexual and lesbian women had consistently greater odds of not knowing their family health history (e.g., odds ratios of 2.59 and 1.56 for breast cancer, respectively).

CONCLUSION

To avoid exacerbating existing health disparities, in the era of precision medicine, we must address gaps in knowledge of family health history.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定性少数群体女性与异性恋女性在家族健康史知识方面是否存在差异。

方法

本研究使用了 Susan Love 研究基金会《女性健康研究》的在线调查数据。我们纳入了在 2012 年至 2015 年期间完成了六次在线调查中的两次的女性(n=22410)。

结果

与异性恋女性相比,双性恋和女同性恋女性对家族健康史的了解明显较少(例如,乳腺癌的比值比分别为 2.59 和 1.56)。

结论

在精准医疗时代,为避免加剧现有的健康差距,我们必须解决家族健康史知识方面的差距。

相似文献

1
Differences in Family Health History Knowledge Among Bisexual and Lesbian Women.双性恋和女同性恋者家庭健康史知识的差异。
LGBT Health. 2019 Apr;6(3):134-137. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2018.0217. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
2
Cancer diagnoses among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults: results from the 2013-2016 National Health Interview Survey.女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋成年人中的癌症诊断情况:2013 - 2016年美国国家健康访谈调查结果
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Sep;29(9):845-854. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1060-x. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
3
Dietary Patterns during Adulthood among Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Women in the Nurses' Health Study II.护士健康研究II中女同性恋、双性恋和异性恋成年女性的饮食模式。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Mar;117(3):386-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.028. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
Experiences and unmet needs of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people with cancer care: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.癌症护理中男同性恋、女同性恋和双性恋者的体验和未满足的需求:系统评价和荟萃综合。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jun;27(6):1480-1489. doi: 10.1002/pon.4674. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
Contraceptive Use Effectiveness and Pregnancy Prevention Information Preferences Among Heterosexual and Sexual Minority College Women.异性恋和性少数群体的女大学生的避孕效果和怀孕预防信息偏好。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jul-Aug;28(4):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
6
Are alcohol-related disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual youth decreasing?酒精相关的性少数青年和异性恋青年之间的差异是否在减少?
Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):1931-1941. doi: 10.1111/add.13896. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
7
Differences in Mental, Cognitive, and Functional Health by Sexual Orientation Among Older Women: Analysis of the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.不同性取向老年女性的心理健康、认知功能和功能健康的差异:对 2015 年行为风险因素监测系统的分析。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jul 16;59(4):749-759. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx215.
8
Sexual orientation measurement and chronic disease disparities: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2014.性取向测量与慢性病差异:2009-2014 年全国健康与营养调查。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):72-85. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Disparities in Chronic Health Outcomes and Health Behaviors Between Lesbian and Heterosexual Adult Women in Pittsburgh: A Longitudinal Study.匹兹堡女同性恋和异性恋成年女性慢性健康结局和健康行为的差异:一项纵向研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Aug;29(8):1059-1067. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8052. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
HIV and Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Risk Behaviors Among Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Lesbian Women Who Inject Drugs in Australia.澳大利亚异性恋、双性恋和女同性恋注射吸毒者中的 HIV 和丙型肝炎病毒感染及危险行为。
LGBT Health. 2015 Jun;2(2):127-34. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2014.0116. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding Family Health History to Include Family Medication History.将家族健康史扩展至纳入家族用药史。
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 25;13(3):410. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030410.
2
Barriers to family history knowledge and family communication among LGBTQ+ individuals in the context of hereditary cancer risk assessment.LGBTQ+ 个体在遗传性癌症风险评估背景下的家族病史知识和家族沟通障碍。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Feb;31(1):230-241. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1476. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
3
Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations.癌症健康评估惠及众人(CHARM):一项评估多种癌症遗传学服务提供模式及其对不同人群影响的临床试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106432. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106432. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Prevalence and Correlates of Family Cancer History Knowledge and Communication Among US Adults.美国家庭癌症史知识的流行情况及相关因素分析,以及美国家庭癌症史信息沟通情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Nov 19;17:E146. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200257.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer in lesbians and bisexual women: systematic review of incidence, prevalence and risk studies.女同性恋和双性恋女性中的乳腺癌:发病率、患病率和风险研究的系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 5;13:1127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1127.
2
Perceived familiarity with and importance of family health history among a medically underserved population.医疗服务不足人群对家族健康史的感知熟悉度及重要性。
J Community Genet. 2012 Oct;3(4):285-95. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0097-x. Epub 2012 May 9.
3
Confirmation of family cancer history reported in a population-based survey.家族癌症史在基于人群的调查中的报告确认。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 May 18;103(10):788-97. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr114. Epub 2011 May 11.
4
National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Family History and Improving Health.美国国立卫生研究院科学会议声明:家族史与增进健康
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):872-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00165.
5
When family means more (or less) than genetics: the intersection of culture, family and genomics.当家庭的意义大于(或小于)基因:文化、家庭与基因组学的交汇
J Transcult Nurs. 2009 Jul;20(3):270-7. doi: 10.1177/1043659609334931.
6
Collection and use of cancer family history in primary care.基层医疗中癌症家族史的收集与应用。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Oct(159):1-84.
7
What is in a cause? Exploring the relationship between genetic cause and felt stigma.病因何在?探究基因病因与感知到的污名之间的关系。
Genet Med. 2006 Jan;8(1):33-42. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000195894.67756.8b.
8
Sexual orientation, health risk factors, and physical functioning in the Nurses' Health Study II.护士健康研究II中的性取向、健康风险因素与身体机能
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Nov;13(9):1033-47. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.1033.
9
Awareness of family health history as a risk factor for disease--United States, 2004.将家族健康史作为疾病风险因素的认知——美国,2004年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Nov 12;53(44):1044-7.
10
Comparing breast cancer risk between lesbians and their heterosexual sisters.比较女同性恋者与其异性恋姐妹患乳腺癌的风险。
Womens Health Issues. 2004 Mar-Apr;14(2):60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2004.03.004.