One Health Center for Zoonoses and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 334, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 21;19(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3812-y.
Taenia solium taeniosis/cysticercosis is a public health and agricultural problem, especially in low-income countries, and has been ranked the top foodborne parasitic hazard globally. In 2012, the World Health Organization published a roadmap that called for a validated strategy for T. solium control and elimination by 2015. This goal has not been met, and validated evidence of effective control or elimination in endemic countries is still incomplete. Measuring and evaluating success of control programmes remains difficult, as locally acceptable targets have not been defined as part of the 2012 roadmap nor from other sources, and the performance of tools to measure effect are limited.
We believe that an international agreement supported by the tripartite World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and World Organisation for Animal Health is needed to facilitate endemic countries in publicising SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable/attainable, Relevant, Time-bound) country-level control target goals. These goals should be achievable through locally acceptable adoption of options from within a standardised 'intervention tool-kit', and progress towards these goals should be monitored using standardised and consistent diagnostics. Several intervention tools are available which can contribute to control of T. solium, but the combination of these - the most effective control algorithm - still needs to be identified. In order to mount control efforts and ensure political commitment, stakeholder engagement and funding, we argue that a stepwise approach, as developed for Rabies control, is necessary if control efforts are to be successful and sustainable.
The stepwise approach can provide the framework for the development of realistic control goals of endemic areas, the implementation of intervention algorithms, and the standardised monitoring of the evaluation of the progress towards obtaining the control target goals and eventually elimination.
猪带绦虫病/囊虫病是一个公共卫生和农业问题,尤其在低收入国家,它已被列为全球头号食源性寄生虫病危害。2012 年,世界卫生组织发布了一份路线图,呼吁在 2015 年前制定并验证针对猪带绦虫病的控制和消除策略。但这一目标并未实现,在流行国家,有效的控制或消除的验证证据仍然不完整。由于尚未确定作为 2012 年路线图一部分或其他来源的当地可接受目标,衡量和评估控制规划的成功仍然具有挑战性,而且衡量效果的工具的性能也受到限制。
我们认为,需要世界卫生组织、联合国粮食及农业组织和世界动物卫生组织三方支持的一项国际协议,以促进流行国家宣传具体、可衡量、可实现/可达到、相关和有时限的(SMART)国家级控制目标。这些目标应通过在标准化“干预工具包”内采用可接受的本地选项来实现,并且应使用标准化和一致的诊断方法监测实现这些目标的进展情况。有几种干预工具可用于控制猪带绦虫病,但仍需确定这些工具的最佳组合,即最有效的控制算法。为了开展控制工作并确保政治承诺、利益相关者参与和资金投入,我们认为,必须采取分阶段的方法,就像为控制狂犬病所制定的方法一样,如果要使控制工作取得成功并可持续,这是必要的。
分阶段方法可以为制定流行地区的现实控制目标、实施干预算法以及标准化监测实现控制目标和最终消除的进展情况提供框架。