• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国妇产科学会（DGGG）妇科肿瘤学工作组（AGO）和妇科内镜工作组（AGE）子宫委员会关于比较早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术的随机研究的最新意见（LACC）

Updated Opinion of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) and the Gynecological Endoscopy Working Group (AGE) of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) on the Randomized Study Comparing Minimally Invasive with Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer (LACC).

作者信息

Hillemanns Peter, Brucker Sara, Holthaus Bernd, Kimmig Rainer, Lampe Björn, Runnebaum Ingo, Ulrich Uwe, Wallwiener Markus, Fehm Tanja, Tempfer Clemens

机构信息

Universitätsfrauenklinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Feb;79(2):145-147. doi: 10.1055/a-0824-7929. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1055/a-0824-7929
PMID:30792544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6379161/
Abstract

In this opinion on the randomized study comparing minimally invasive with abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer (LACC), the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) and the Gynecological Endoscopy Working Group (AGE) of the Germany Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) state that, based on their examination of the published data, patients with FIGO stage IA1 (with LVSI), IA2 or IB1 cervical cancer must be informed about the results of this LACC study prior to making a decision on the route for radical hysterectomy.

摘要

在这份关于比较早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术的随机研究（LACC）的意见中，德国妇产科学会（DGGG）妇科肿瘤学工作组（AGO）的子宫委员会和妇科内镜工作组（AGE）指出，基于对已发表数据的审查，国际妇产科联盟（FIGO）IA1期（伴淋巴血管间隙浸润）、IA2期或IB1期宫颈癌患者在决定根治性子宫切除术的手术路径之前，必须被告知这项LACC研究的结果。

相似文献

1
Updated Opinion of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) and the Gynecological Endoscopy Working Group (AGE) of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) on the Randomized Study Comparing Minimally Invasive with Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer (LACC).德国妇产科学会（DGGG）妇科肿瘤学工作组（AGO）和妇科内镜工作组（AGE）子宫委员会关于比较早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术的随机研究的最新意见（LACC）
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Feb;79(2):145-147. doi: 10.1055/a-0824-7929. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
2
Comment on the LACC Trial Investigating Early-stage Cervical Cancer by the Uterus Commission of the Study Group for Gynecologic Oncology (AGO) and the Study Group for Gynecologic Endoscopy (AGE) of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG).德国妇产科学会（DGGG）妇科肿瘤学研究组子宫委员会（AGO）和妇科内镜学研究组（AGE）对早期宫颈癌LACC试验的评论
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Aug;78(8):766-767. doi: 10.1055/a-0655-8112. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
3
Statement of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) on Surgical Therapy for Patients with Stage IA2-IIB1 Cervical Cancer.妇科肿瘤学工作组（AGO）子宫委员会关于IA2-IIB1期宫颈癌患者手术治疗的声明。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023 Oct 5;83(10):1199-1204. doi: 10.1055/a-2160-3279. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement.妇科肿瘤学韩国学会、韩国妇产科学会和妇科内镜和微创外科韩国学会关于宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的微创外科立场声明。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;30(5):e104. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e104.
5
Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.新辅助化疗后对局部晚期宫颈癌女性进行机器人根治性子宫切除术的可行性
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.04.060. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Revisiting Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Management of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.重新审视早期宫颈癌的微创外科治疗。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):86-90. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7263.
7
Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) - Part 2 with Recommendations on Psycho-oncology, Rehabilitation, Follow-up, Recurrence, Palliative Therapy and Healthcare Facilities.子宫颈癌的诊断、治疗与随访。德国妇科与产科学会、德国癌症协会和德国妇科与产科学会指南（S3级，德国医学科学与医学质量评估委员会登记号032/033OL，2021年5月） - 第2部分：关于心理肿瘤学、康复、随访、复发、姑息治疗和医疗设施的建议
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Feb 11;82(2):181-205. doi: 10.1055/a-1671-2446. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.比较肿瘤直径 3cm 或更大的 FIGO 分期 IB 和 IIA 期宫颈癌行腹腔镜与开腹广泛子宫切除术的疗效。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Feb;24(2):280-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000052.
9
Statement of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Prior to Definitive Radiochemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.妇科肿瘤学工作组（AGO）子宫委员会关于局部晚期宫颈癌患者在确定性放化疗前新辅助化疗的声明。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Apr 15;84(6):523-528. doi: 10.1055/a-2279-3163. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Sexual function after modified radical hysterectomy (Piver II/Type B) vs. classic radical hysterectomy (Piver III/Type C2) for early stage cervical cancer. A prospective study.改良根治性子宫切除术（Piver II/Type B）与经典根治性子宫切除术（Piver III/Type C2）治疗早期宫颈癌的性功能比较。一项前瞻性研究。
J Sex Med. 2012 Mar;9(3):909-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02581.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Minimally Invasive Treatment Approach for Early-Stage Uterine Cervical Cancer: The Impact of the LACC Trial and a Literature Review.早期子宫颈癌的微创治疗方法：LACC试验的影响及文献综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 28;61(4):620. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040620.
2
The Effect of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Surgical Volume on Oncology Outcomes in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术手术量对早期宫颈癌肿瘤学结局的影响
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 7;8:692163. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.692163. eCollection 2021.
3
Impact of surgeon learning curve in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy on early stage cervical cancer patient survival.外科医生在早期宫颈癌患者微创根治性子宫切除术中学习曲线对患者生存的影响。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Sep;13(3):231-239. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.3.035.
4
Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.宫颈癌手术治疗中的挑战与争议：开放性根治性子宫切除术与微创根治性子宫切除术
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 24;10(17):3761. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173761.
5
Association of preoperative cone biopsy with recurrences after radical hysterectomy.术前锥形活检与根治性子宫切除术后复发的关系。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;305(1):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06145-0. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
6
Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs.宫颈癌手术：现状
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Apr 30;10(2):75-83. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_81_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
7
Radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: what shall we do after the LACC trial?广泛性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌：LACC 试验后我们该怎么做？
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;302(2):289-292. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05627-x.
8
Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate?早期宫颈癌的外科治疗：腹腔镜手术何时适用？
Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Jan 27;22(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-0876-1.
9
The 34th Annual Meeting of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019: meeting report.第 34 届韩国妇科肿瘤学会年会 2019 年会议报告。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;30(4):e91. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e91.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
2
Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的生存情况。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1905-1914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
3
Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌患者行腹式与腹腔镜/机器人根治性子宫切除术后的复发模式及生存率
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Jan;42(1):77-86. doi: 10.1111/jog.12840. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌：匹配队列研究的长期生存结果。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):903-11. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr360. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
5
A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的对比研究：一项长期随访研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 May;156(1):83-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.016. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
6
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.早期宫颈癌患者行全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术加淋巴结清扫术的对比：我们的经验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1316-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0342-7. Epub 2009 Feb 18.