President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) MalariaCare Project, PATH, Washington, District of Columbia.
Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Apr;100(4):882-888. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0365.
Since 2010, the WHO has recommended that clinical decision-making for malaria case management be performed based on the results of a parasitological test result. Between 2015 and 2017, the U.S. President's Malaria Initiative-funded MalariaCare project supported the implementation of this practice in eight sub-Saharan African countries through 5,382 outreach training and supportive supervision visits to 3,563 health facilities. During these visits, trained government supervisors used a 25-point checklist to observe clinicians' performance in outpatient departments, and then provided structured mentoring and action planning. At baseline, more than 90% of facilities demonstrated a good understanding of WHO recommendations-when tests should be ordered, using test results to develop an accurate final diagnosis, severity assessment, and providing the correct prescription. However, significant deficits were found in history taking, conducting a physical examination, and communicating with patients and their caregivers. After three visits, worker performance demonstrated steady improvement-in particular, with checking for factors associated with increased morbidity and mortality: one sign of severe malaria (72.9-85.5%), pregnancy (81.1-87.4%), and anemia (77.2-86.4%). A regression analysis predicted an overall improvement in clinical performance of 6.3% ( < 0.001) by the third visit. These findings indicate that in most health facilities, there is good baseline knowledge on the processes of quality clinical management, but further training and on-site mentoring are needed to improve the clinical interaction that focuses on second-order decision-making, such as severity of illness, management of non-malarial fever, and completing the patient-provider communication loop.
自 2010 年以来,世卫组织建议根据寄生虫学检测结果来进行疟疾临床决策。2015 年至 2017 年期间,美国总统疟疾倡议资助的 MalariaCare 项目通过为 3563 家卫生机构提供 5382 次上门培训和支持性监督访问,支持在 8 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家实施这一做法。在这些访问中,经过培训的政府监督人员使用 25 分制检查表来观察门诊医生的表现,然后提供结构化指导和行动计划。在基线时,超过 90%的卫生机构对世卫组织的建议有很好的理解——何时应该进行检测、如何利用检测结果做出准确的最终诊断、严重程度评估以及提供正确的处方。然而,在病史采集、进行体格检查以及与患者及其照护者进行沟通方面,仍存在显著不足。经过三次访问后,工作人员的表现稳步提高——特别是在检查与发病率和死亡率增加相关的因素方面:严重疟疾的一个体征(72.9-85.5%)、妊娠(81.1-87.4%)和贫血(77.2-86.4%)。回归分析预测,到第三次访问时,临床表现总体将提高 6.3%(<0.001)。这些发现表明,在大多数卫生机构,对质量临床管理流程有很好的基线知识,但需要进一步培训和现场指导,以改善侧重于二级决策的临床互动,如疾病严重程度、非疟疾发热的管理以及完成医患沟通循环。