Reinier van Arkel Groep, Psychotrauma Centrum Zuid Nederland, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group, Arq, Diemen, the Netherlands.
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Feb;32(1):23-31. doi: 10.1002/jts.22363.
The inclusion of a complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) diagnosis in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases reflects growing evidence that a subgroup of individuals with PTSD also suffer from disturbances in emotion regulation, interpersonal skills, and self-concept, which together are termed "disturbances in self-organization" (DSO). Although CPTSD is assumed to result from exposure to complex traumatic events, emotional neglect may be an important contributor. This study investigated the presence of CPTSD, defined by endorsement of PTSD and DSO symptoms in a clinical postwar generation sample. The sample consisted of 218 patients who had been exposed to emotional neglect in childhood, a subgroup of whom had also been exposed to potentially traumatic events. Using items from the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire and the Brief Symptom Inventory, a latent class analysis revealed two classes: high endorsement of almost all CPTSD symptoms (n = 83; 38.1%) and low endorsement of all CPTSD symptoms (n = 135; 61.9%). Contrary to our hypothesis, no DSO-only class was found. The R3step method showed gender and number of traumatic events to be significant predictors of class membership. Compared to the low endorsement class, individuals in the CPTSD class were more likely to be female, p = .013, and to report a higher number of traumatic experiences, p < .001. The potential intermediary role of emotional neglect in the development of DSO and CPTSD is discussed.
创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的纳入第十一版国际疾病分类反映了越来越多的证据,表明 PTSD 患者的亚组还存在情绪调节、人际关系技能和自我概念方面的障碍,统称为“自我组织障碍”(DSO)。尽管 CPTSD 被认为是由复杂创伤事件引起的,但情感忽视可能是一个重要的促成因素。本研究调查了在战后临床一代样本中,通过 PTSD 和 DSO 症状的支持来确定 CPTSD 的存在。该样本由 218 名曾在儿童时期经历过情感忽视的患者组成,其中一部分患者还曾经历过潜在的创伤性事件。使用哈佛创伤问卷和简明症状量表的项目,潜类分析显示出两类:几乎所有 CPTSD 症状的高支持率(n = 83;38.1%)和所有 CPTSD 症状的低支持率(n = 135;61.9%)。与我们的假设相反,没有发现 DSO 单一类别。R3step 方法表明性别和创伤事件数量是类别的重要预测因素。与低支持率类别的个体相比,CPTSD 类别的个体更可能是女性,p =.013,并且报告了更多的创伤经历,p <.001。讨论了情感忽视在 DSO 和 CPTSD 发展中的潜在中介作用。