Stinson C G, Tiwari N P
Food Laboratory, Alberta Department of Agriculture, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 4P2.
J Food Prot. 1978 Apr;41(4):269-271. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-41.4.269.
Four methods to detect microbial contamination on food plant equipment surfaces were compared to determine the accuracy, precision, cost and time required to do each test. A standard method for swabbing; a simplified swab test (Millipore Corporation); a contact-transfer method (Con-Tact-It, Birko Chemical Corporation) and a direct method using Rodac plates (BBL) were evaluated. The equipment surfaces were found to be highly contaminated indicating the necessity for regular microbial testing. Under conditions of the test, there was good agreement in enumeration of bacteria between the standard swab test and both the Millipore swab method and the Con-Tact-It system; the standard swab method and Rodac plates showed the best precision. The contact methods were by far the quickest tests to do, and the Con-Tact-It system was the least expensive.
比较了四种检测食品工厂设备表面微生物污染的方法,以确定每种测试所需的准确性、精密度、成本和时间。评估了一种标准擦拭方法;一种简化的擦拭测试(密理博公司);一种接触转移方法(Con-Tact-It,Birko化学公司)和一种使用Rodac平板(BBL)的直接方法。发现设备表面受到高度污染,这表明有必要进行定期微生物检测。在测试条件下,标准擦拭测试与密理博擦拭方法和Con-Tact-It系统在细菌计数方面有很好的一致性;标准擦拭方法和Rodac平板显示出最佳的精密度。接触方法是迄今为止最快的测试方法,而Con-Tact-It系统成本最低。