Beltran-Alcrudo Daniel, Falco John R, Raizman Eran, Dietze Klaas
Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia, Food and Agriculture Organization, Budapest, Hungary.
Animal Plant Health Inspection Service - International Service (USDA-APHIS-IS), United States Department of Agriculture, Riverdale, USA.
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Feb 22;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1800-5.
As globalization increases the interconnectedness between nations, economies, and industries, the introduction of diseases will continue to remain a prominent threat to the livestock sector and the trade of animals and animal products, as well as the livelihoods of farmers, food security and public health. The global pig sector, with its size and dichotomy between production type and biosecurity level, is particularly vulnerable to the transmission of transboundary animal diseases such as African and classical swine fever, foot and mouth disease, or porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome. All of the above pose a constant threat to swine health, mainly as a result of both formal and informal international trade.Inspired in the risk assessment methodology, this paper classifies and provides an overview of the different pig disease introduction and exposure pathways, illustrated with abundant examples. Introduction pathways are classified as formal international trade (by product), informal international trade (by product), and spread through fomites. Formal trade of pigs and pork products is regulated by legislation and measures protecting animal populations from exotic diseases. Much more difficult to control is the transboundary swine disease transmission originating through informal trade, which entails illegal smuggling, but also the informal cross-border transfer of animals and products for personal use or within informal market chains. Meat products are most commonly mentioned, although fomites have also played a role in some cases, with live pigs, being more difficult to smuggle playing a role less frequently. The main exposure pathways are also described with the oral route playing a prominent role.Risk assessments can aid in the identification of pathways of pathogen introduction and exposure. However, quantitative information on informal disease introduction pathways remains very scarce and often incomplete, making it difficult to estimate the actual magnitudes of risks. Nevertheless, this knowledge is deemed essential to set up risk based awareness, prevention and surveillance programs that correspond to reality.
随着全球化增强了国家、经济和产业之间的相互联系,疾病的传入将继续对畜牧业、动物及动物产品贸易以及农民生计、粮食安全和公共卫生构成重大威胁。全球养猪业规模庞大,且生产类型与生物安全水平存在差异,特别容易受到非洲猪瘟、古典猪瘟、口蹄疫或猪繁殖与呼吸综合征等跨境动物疾病传播的影响。上述所有疾病都持续威胁着猪的健康,这主要是正规和非正规国际贸易所致。
本文借鉴风险评估方法,对不同的猪病传入和暴露途径进行分类并提供概述,文中配有大量示例。传入途径分为正规国际贸易(按产品)、非正规国际贸易(按产品)以及通过污染物传播。猪和猪肉产品的正规贸易受到保护动物群体免受外来疾病侵害的法规和措施的监管。更难控制的是通过非正规贸易传播的跨境猪病,这不仅包括非法走私,还包括动物和产品为个人使用或在非正规市场链内的非正规跨境转移。虽然污染物在某些情况下也起了作用,但最常被提及的是肉类产品,而活猪由于更难走私,其作用相对较少。主要暴露途径也有描述,其中经口途径起主要作用。
风险评估有助于识别病原体传入和暴露的途径。然而,关于非正规疾病传入途径的定量信息仍然非常稀少且往往不完整,这使得难以估计实际风险程度。尽管如此,这些知识对于建立基于风险的、符合实际情况的认识、预防和监测计划至关重要。