Joint Doctoral Program in Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University & University of California, San Diego, United States.
Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS & Aix-Marseille Université, France.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jun;129:385-396. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Words and pseudowords from high-density orthographic neighborhoods elicit larger amplitude N400s than similar items from low-density orthographic neighborhoods in the lexical decision task. This pattern could be interpreted as an increase in the amount of lexico-semantic information to be processed or as an increase in difficulty identifying a word (or rejecting a pseudoword) amongst many co-activated alternatives. In order to dissociate between these mechanisms, we compared neighborhood effects between a lexical decision task (LDT) and a letter search task (LST). Behaviorally, we found the standard neighborhood and lexicality effects in the LDT, but no significant effects in the LST. Thus, behavioral responses were sensitive to the decisions required by the respective tasks. Electrophysiologically, we found similar N400 neighborhood effects between tasks for words, but the N400 neighborhood effect for pseudowords was only present in the LDT. Moreover, the effect of neighborhood in the LDT occurred earlier for words than for pseudowords. These nuanced differences in the time course and automaticity of word and pseudoword neighborhood effects lend insight into the processes that underlie N400 effects of orthographic neighborhood and how they unfold over time. We propose that the early neighborhood effects for words across tasks were driven by highly automatized word identification processes that were sensitive to the lateral inhibition generated by orthographic neighbors. In contrast, the later neighborhood effects for pseudowords in the LDT could have been driven by task-specific processes tied to how global lexical activity is used to make a lexical decision.
在词汇判断任务中,来自高密度正字法邻域的单词和伪单词比来自低密度正字法邻域的相似单词会引起更大的 N400 振幅。这种模式可以解释为需要处理的词汇语义信息量增加,或者在许多共同激活的替代项中识别单词(或拒绝伪单词)的难度增加。为了区分这些机制,我们比较了词汇判断任务(LDT)和字母搜索任务(LST)之间的邻域效应。行为上,我们在 LDT 中发现了标准的邻域和词汇效应,但在 LST 中没有发现显著的效应。因此,行为反应对各自任务所需的决策敏感。电生理上,我们在两个任务中都发现了相似的单词 N400 邻域效应,但伪单词的 N400 邻域效应仅在 LDT 中存在。此外,在 LDT 中,单词的邻域效应比伪单词更早出现。这些在时间进程和单词和伪单词邻域效应的自动性方面的细微差异,为理解基础正字法邻域 N400 效应的过程以及它们如何随时间展开提供了深入的见解。我们提出,跨任务的单词早期邻域效应是由高度自动化的单词识别过程驱动的,这些过程对正字法邻居产生的侧向抑制敏感。相比之下,LDT 中伪单词的后期邻域效应可能是由与如何利用全局词汇活动做出词汇判断的特定任务过程驱动的。