State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 20;666:226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.076. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
In the present study, the temporal distribution of PM-bound organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) was comprehensively investigated in various indoor environments as well as outdoor air in Beijing, China over a one-year period. The mean concentrations of ΣOPFRs were 22.7 ng m and 1.40 ng m in paired indoor and outdoor PM, respectively. The concentrations of tri-n-butyl phosphate (TNBP), tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) and tris (2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP) in indoor PM were significantly correlated with those in outdoor PM. For different indoor microenvironments, mean concentrations of ΣOPFRs were in the order of office (29.0 ± 11.7 ng m) > home (24.0 ± 9.4 ng m) > dormitory (19.4 ± 4.9 ng m) > activity room (14.4 ± 3.1 ng m). TCIPP was the most abundant compound in the indoor PM, followed by TCEP. Significantly higher concentrations of OPFRs were observed in indoor environments with more furnishing, electronics or other materials (p < 0.05). Moreover, lower levels of OPFRs in indoor air were observed at well-ventilated (with higher air exchange rate) indoor sampling sites. Concentrations of ΣOPFRs in the activity room, dormitory, homes and outdoor sites generally increased in summer and heating seasons (November 2016 to February 2017). Significant correlations (p < 0.05) were observed between temperatures and mass concentrations of OPFRs with higher vapor pressures, i.e. TNBP, TCEP and TCIPP in all indoor and outdoor samples. Seasonal differences in human exposure were observed and the highest daily exposure dose occurred in summer. Toddlers may suffer the highest exposure risk of PM-bound OPFRs via inhalation among all age groups. This is one of the very few studies that have revealed the seasonal variation and human exposure of PM-bound OPFRs in different microenvironments, which shed light on emission sources and fate of OPFRs and potential human exposure pathway.
本研究在中国北京,通过为期一年的时间,全面调查了各种室内环境以及室外空气中的 PM 结合型有机磷酸酯阻燃剂(OPFRs)的时间分布。室内和室外 PM 中ΣOPFRs 的平均浓度分别为 22.7ng/m 和 1.40ng/m。室内 PM 中三丁基磷酸酯(TNBP)、三(2-氯乙基)磷酸酯(TCEP)和三(2-氯异丙基)磷酸酯(TCIPP)的浓度与室外 PM 中的浓度显著相关。对于不同的室内微环境,ΣOPFRs 的平均浓度顺序为办公室(29.0±11.7ng/m)>家庭(24.0±9.4ng/m)>宿舍(19.4±4.9ng/m)>活动室(14.4±3.1ng/m)。室内 PM 中含量最丰富的化合物是 TCIPP,其次是 TCEP。在有更多家具、电子产品或其他材料的室内环境中,OPFRs 的浓度明显更高(p<0.05)。此外,通风良好(空气交换率较高)的室内采样点的室内空气中 OPFRs 水平较低。活动室内、宿舍内、家庭内和室外场所的ΣOPFRs 浓度一般在夏季和供暖季节(2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 2 月)增加。在所有室内和室外样本中,与具有较高蒸气压的 OPFRs(即 TNBP、TCEP 和 TCIPP)的温度和质量浓度之间观察到显著相关性(p<0.05)。观察到人类暴露的季节性差异,夏季的每日暴露剂量最高。在所有年龄段中,幼儿通过吸入 PM 结合型 OPFRs 可能遭受的暴露风险最高。这是为数不多的揭示不同微环境中 PM 结合型 OPFRs 的季节性变化和人类暴露情况的研究之一,为 OPFRs 的排放源和归宿以及潜在的人类暴露途径提供了线索。