International Joint Research Center for Persistent Toxic Substances (IJRC-PTS), State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, and School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China; International Joint Research Center for Arctic Environment and Ecosystem (IJRC-AEE), State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, and School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China; University Corporation for Polar Research, Beijing 100875, China.
International Joint Research Center for Persistent Toxic Substances (IJRC-PTS), State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, and School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China; International Joint Research Center for Arctic Environment and Ecosystem (IJRC-AEE), State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, and School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China; University Corporation for Polar Research, Beijing 100875, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 15;665:731-738. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.098. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) are widely added to consumer products and building materials, which may pose potential health risk to humans. But information on their contamination and human exposure in the indoor environment especially dormitories in northern China is rare. In this study, twelve OPFRs were investigated in college dormitory dust that collected from Harbin, Shenyang, and Baoding, in northern China. Indoor dust samples were also collected from homes and public microenvironments (PMEs) in Harbin for comparison. The median ∑OPFR concentrations in dormitory dust in Shenyang samples (8690 ng/g) were higher than those in Baoding (6540 ng/g) and Harbin (6190 ng/g). The median ∑OPFR concentrations in home dust (7150 ng/g) were higher than in dormitory and PME dust (5340 ng/g) in Harbin. Tris(2‑chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) and tris (2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP) were the most abundant chlorinated OPFRs, while triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) and tris(2‑butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBOEP) were the dominant non-chlorinated OPFRs. The daily intakes of ∑OPFR were estimated, with the median values for female students (2.45 ng/kg-day) higher than those for male students (2.15 ng/kg-day) while were similar to adults (2.45 ng/kg-day) in homes. The estimated daily intakes (EDI) of these OPFRs from indoor dust in Harbin were all below the recommended values. The calculated non-carcinogenic hazard quotients (10-10) from OPFRs were much lower than the theoretical risk threshold. Meanwhile, carcinogenic risk (CR) of tri‑n‑butyl phosphate (TNBP), TCEP, tris(2‑ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEHP), and tris(1,3‑dichloroisopropyl) phosphate (TDCIPP) were also estimated. The highest carcinogenic risk of TCEP for gender-specific and age-specific category range from 1.75 × 10 to 2.46 × 10 from exposure to indoor dust indicated a low potential carcinogenic risk for human exposure.
有机磷阻燃剂(OPFRs)广泛添加到消费品和建筑材料中,可能对人类健康构成潜在风险。但是,有关它们在中国北方室内环境(尤其是宿舍)中的污染和人体暴露的信息却很少。在这项研究中,我们研究了中国北方哈尔滨、沈阳和保定采集的大学生宿舍灰尘中的十二种 OPFRs。室内灰尘样品也从哈尔滨的家庭和公共微环境(PME)中收集进行比较。沈阳样本中宿舍灰尘的∑OPFR 浓度中位数(8690ng/g)高于保定(6540ng/g)和哈尔滨(6190ng/g)。哈尔滨家庭灰尘中的∑OPFR 浓度中位数(7150ng/g)高于宿舍和 PME 灰尘(5340ng/g)。三(2-氯乙基)磷酸酯(TCEP)和三(2-氯异丙基)磷酸酯(TCIPP)是最丰富的含氯 OPFR,而磷酸三苯酯(TPHP)和三(2-丁氧基乙基)磷酸酯(TBOEP)是主要的非含氯 OPFR。估计了∑OPFR 的每日摄入量,女学生的中位数(2.45ng/kg-天)高于男学生(2.15ng/kg-天),与家庭中的成年人(2.45ng/kg-天)相似。从哈尔滨室内灰尘中估计的这些 OPFR 的每日摄入量(EDI)均低于推荐值。从 OPFRs 计算的非致癌危害系数(10-10)远低于理论风险阈值。同时,还估算了三正丁基磷酸酯(TNBP)、TCEP、三(2-乙基己基)磷酸酯(TEHP)和三(1,3-二氯异丙基)磷酸酯(TDCIPP)的致癌风险(CR)。暴露于室内灰尘中性别和年龄特定类别的 TCEP 的最高致癌风险范围从 1.75×10-10到 2.46×10-10,表明人类接触的潜在致癌风险较低。