• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性纵向混合方法病例研究方案:支持更健康青少年照护模式(MoCHA 研究)。

Protocol for a prospective, longitudinal mixed-methods case study: supporting a Model of Care for Healthier Adolescents (The MoCHA study).

机构信息

The Albert Road Clinic, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e025098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025098.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025098
PMID:30798315
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6398630/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Improving mental healthcare for adolescents is a global policy priority. Despite demands for community-based services, many adolescents require more intensive interventions, such as an inpatient admission. This is typically at a point of crisis, often accompanied by intense emotional dysregulation, impairment of coping function and impulsivity. However, limited evidence exists on how best to support this group while they are in inpatient care, aside from pharmacological treatments which have a limited role in adolescents. Little is known about the models of care (MoC) offered in inpatient units, whether adolescents perceive these as helpful and the perspectives of caregivers and clinicians. Here, we describe a protocol which aims to explore and evaluate an inpatient MoC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed a longitudinal, mixed-methods, case study. The population consists of adolescents, caregivers and clinicians at a single inpatient unit in Melbourne, Australia. Standardised outcome measures, including semi- structured interviews, will be administered to adolescents at three time-points, T1 (admission), T2 (discharge) and T3 (6 months post discharge). Caregivers will also be interviewed at T1, T2 and T3. Clinicians will be interviewed once. The measures include: Life Problems Inventory, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale and the Youth Self-Report. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents will be collected at T1 and T2. Quantitative analysis will include descriptive statistics and paired t-tests summarising adolescents admitted to the unit, clinical characteristics and longitudinal data on symptomatology. Qualitative data will be analysed using both thematic and trajectory analysis. Data collection began in May 2017 and will cease with T3 interviews by October 2018. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION.

摘要

简介

改善青少年心理健康是全球政策重点。尽管需要社区为基础的服务,但许多青少年需要更密集的干预,如住院治疗。这通常是在危机时刻,常常伴随着强烈的情绪失调、应对功能受损和冲动。然而,除了在青少年中作用有限的药物治疗外,对于如何在住院治疗期间最好地支持这一群体,证据有限。关于住院病房提供的护理模式(MoC)知之甚少,青少年是否认为这些模式有用,以及照顾者和临床医生的看法。在这里,我们描述了一项旨在探索和评估住院 MoC 的方案。

方法和分析

我们设计了一项纵向、混合方法、案例研究。研究人群包括澳大利亚墨尔本一家住院病房的青少年、照顾者和临床医生。将在三个时间点(T1[入院]、T2[出院]和 T3[出院后 6 个月])向青少年提供标准化的结果测量,包括半结构化访谈。照顾者也将在 T1、T2 和 T3 进行访谈。临床医生将进行一次访谈。测量包括:生活问题清单、快速抑郁症状清单、凯斯勒心理困扰量表和青少年自我报告。国民健康结果量表将在 T1 和 T2 收集。定量分析将包括描述性统计和配对 t 检验,总结入院青少年、临床特征和症状学的纵向数据。定性数据将使用主题分析和轨迹分析进行分析。数据收集始于 2017 年 5 月,T3 访谈将于 2018 年 10 月结束。

伦理和传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/6398630/9852cca3bd90/bmjopen-2018-025098f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/6398630/9852cca3bd90/bmjopen-2018-025098f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/6398630/9852cca3bd90/bmjopen-2018-025098f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol for a prospective, longitudinal mixed-methods case study: supporting a Model of Care for Healthier Adolescents (The MoCHA study).前瞻性纵向混合方法病例研究方案:支持更健康青少年照护模式(MoCHA 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e025098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025098.
2
Experiences of an adolescent inpatient model of care: Adolescent and caregiver perspectives.青少年住院护理模式的体验:青少年和照顾者的观点。
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2020 Aug;33(3):109-124. doi: 10.1111/jcap.12266. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
3
Longitudinal comparative evaluation of the equivalence of an integrated peer-support and clinical staffing model for residential mental health rehabilitation: a mixed methods protocol incorporating multiple stakeholder perspectives.住院精神卫生康复综合同伴支持与临床人员配备模式等效性的纵向比较评估:一项纳入多利益相关方观点的混合方法方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 2;16:179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0882-x.
4
Patient and carer transition outcomes and experiences at the Westmead Centre for Adolescent and Young Adult Health, Westmead, Australia: protocol for a longitudinal cohort study.澳大利亚韦斯特米德青少年和青年健康中心患者和照顾者的转归和体验:一项纵向队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):e080149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080149.
5
Quality of life and satisfaction with inpatient treatment in adolescents with psychiatric disorders : A comparison between patients', parents', and caregivers' (self-)assessments at admission and discharge.精神疾病青少年的生活质量及对住院治疗的满意度:患者、父母及照护者在入院和出院时(自我)评估的比较
Neuropsychiatr. 2018 Jun;32(2):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s40211-018-0264-3. Epub 2018 May 4.
6
The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.针对预后小于12个月患者的海德堡里程碑式沟通方法(MCA):一项包括随机对照试验的混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Aug 14;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1.
7
The development of an online intervention (Care Assist) to support male caregivers of women with breast cancer: a protocol for a mixed methods study.开发一种在线干预措施(护理助手)以支持乳腺癌女性患者的男性护理者:一项混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 17;8(2):e019530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019530.
8
Effectiveness of an online social support intervention for caregivers of people with dementia: the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.一项针对痴呆症患者照料者的在线社会支持干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Aug 29;18(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2097-y.
9
Existential distress in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: study protocol of a longitudinal cohort study.晚期癌症患者及其照顾者的生存困扰:一项纵向队列研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 24;11(4):e046351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046351.
10
Evaluation of the structured bowel management program in inpatient rehabilitation: a prospective study.住院康复中结构化肠道管理计划的评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):544-51. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1047970.

引用本文的文献

1
Key features of adolescent inpatient units and development of a checklist to improve consistency in reporting of settings.青少年住院病房的主要特征以及制定清单以提高环境报告一致性的方法。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Feb;30(1):74-100. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12856. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Early intervention in youth mental health: progress and future directions.青少年心理健康的早期干预:进展与未来方向。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Nov;21(4):182-184. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300060. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
2
Special edition on inpatient treatment: A new annual tradition.
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Nov;30(4):160-161. doi: 10.1111/jcap.12196.
3
Evaluating effectiveness in adolescent mental health inpatient units: A systematic review.评估青少年心理健康住院病房的疗效:系统评价。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(2):498-513. doi: 10.1111/inm.12418. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
4
Towards relational recovery: Nurses' practices with consumers and families with dependent children in mental health inpatient units.迈向关系恢复:精神科住院病房中护士与有依赖子女的消费者和家庭的实践。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(2):727-736. doi: 10.1111/inm.12359. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
5
Interventions for Adolescent Mental Health: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.青少年心理健康干预措施:系统评价综述
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Oct;59(4S):S49-S60. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.020.
6
Analyzing longitudinal qualitative data: the application of trajectory and recurrent cross-sectional approaches.分析纵向定性数据:轨迹法与重复横断面法的应用
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Mar 2;9:136. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1954-1.
7
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for depression in children and adolescents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.儿童和青少年抑郁症心理治疗的比较疗效与可接受性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
World Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;14(2):207-22. doi: 10.1002/wps.20217.
8
The p Factor: One General Psychopathology Factor in the Structure of Psychiatric Disorders?p因子:精神障碍结构中的一个通用精神病理学因子?
Clin Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;2(2):119-137. doi: 10.1177/2167702613497473.
9
How sample size influences research outcomes.样本量如何影响研究结果。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):27-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo.
10
The French adaptation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents Self-Rated Form (F-HoNOSCA-SR): validation and clinical routine use.《儿童和青少年自评健康的国家结局研究量表(HoNOSCA-SR)的法语适应性:验证和临床常规使用》。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Aug 15;218(1-2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 12.