Katz S, McGinley K, Leyden J J
Arch Dermatol. 1986 Jan;122(1):58-62. doi: 10.1001/archderm.122.1.58.
Six commercially available semiocclusive dressings were tested for their effect on the growth of resident and pathogenic bacteria and the reepithelialization of experimentally induced wounds in human volunteers. Scarification and abrasion-type wounds inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were quantitatively cultured at different times after being covered with the dressings. Reepithelialization was assessed by serial stereomicrographs. None of the dressings was able to prevent clinical infection. All dressings provided microenvironments that were conducive to the growth of resident and pathogenic bacteria. There was no difference in the rates of reepithelialization.
对六种市售半封闭敷料进行了测试,以考察其对人体志愿者体内常驻菌和病原菌生长的影响,以及对实验性诱导伤口再上皮化的影响。用表皮葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、化脓性链球菌和铜绿假单胞菌接种的划痕和擦伤型伤口,在覆盖敷料后的不同时间进行定量培养。通过连续立体显微镜照片评估再上皮化情况。没有一种敷料能够预防临床感染。所有敷料都提供了有利于常驻菌和病原菌生长的微环境。再上皮化速率没有差异。