Mertz P M, Marshall D A, Eaglstein W H
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985 Apr;12(4):662-8. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)70091-6.
This study was designed to examine the possibility that some occlusive dressings are barriers to wound penetration by pathogenic bacteria. Two common skin pathogens, the nonmotile, Staphylococcus aureus, and the motile, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were used to challenge dressings placed on partial-thickness wounds in swine. S. aureus was recovered from 100% of air-exposed wounds (log, 5.5 +/- 1.1) and from 50% of Op-Site-treated and Vigilon-treated wounds (log, 6.1 +/- 1.1). S. aureus was not isolated from DuoDERM-covered wounds. P. aeruginosa was recovered from 100% of air-exposed wounds (log, 5.1 +/- 0.5) and 100% of Op-Site-covered and Vigilon-covered wounds (log, 5.8 +/- 1.8). P. aeruginosa was not recovered from DuoDERM-covered wounds. These studies lend support to the idea that dressings may protect wounds from invasion by pathogenic bacteria and demonstrate the need to evaluate their bacterial barrier properties in situ.
本研究旨在探讨某些封闭性敷料是否会成为病原菌侵入伤口的屏障。选用两种常见的皮肤病原菌,即不运动的金黄色葡萄球菌和运动的铜绿假单胞菌,对置于猪的部分厚度伤口上的敷料进行挑战试验。在100%暴露于空气中的伤口(对数,5.5±1.1)以及50%使用Op-Site和Vigilon处理的伤口(对数,6.1±1.1)中可分离出金黄色葡萄球菌。在使用DuoDERM覆盖的伤口中未分离出金黄色葡萄球菌。在100%暴露于空气中的伤口(对数,5.1±0.5)以及100%使用Op-Site和Vigilon覆盖的伤口(对数,5.8±1.8)中可分离出铜绿假单胞菌。在使用DuoDERM覆盖的伤口中未分离出铜绿假单胞菌。这些研究支持了敷料可能保护伤口免受病原菌侵入的观点,并表明有必要在原位评估其细菌屏障特性。