• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你还是我?人格特质预测事故情境中的牺牲决策。

You or Me? Personality Traits Predict Sacrificial Decisions in an Accident Situation.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2019 May;25(5):1898-1907. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2899227. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2019.2899227
PMID:30802865
Abstract

Emergency situations during car driving sometimes force the driver to make a sudden decision. Predicting these decisions will have important applications in updating risk analyses in insurance applications, but also can give insights for drafting autonomous vehicle guidelines. Studying such behavior in experimental settings, however, is limited by ethical issues as it would endanger peoples' lives. Here, we employed the potential of virtual reality (VR) to investigate decision-making in an extreme situation in which participants would have to sacrifice others in order to save themselves. In a VR driving simulation, participants first trained to complete a difficult course with multiple crossroads in which the wrong turn would lead the car to fall down a cliff. In the testing phase, obstacles suddenly appeared on the "safe" turn of a crossroad: for the control group, obstacles consisted of trees, whereas for the experimental group, they were pedestrians. In both groups, drivers had to decide between falling down the cliff or colliding with the obstacles. Results showed that differences in personality traits were able to predict this decision: in the experimental group, drivers who collided with the pedestrians had significantly higher psychopathy and impulsivity traits, whereas impulsivity alone was to some degree predictive in the control group. Other factors like heart rate differences, gender, video game expertise, and driving experience were not predictive of the emergency decision in either group. Our results show that self-interest related personality traits affect decision-making when choosing between preservation of self or others in extreme situations and showcase the potential of virtual reality in studying and modeling human decision-making.

摘要

驾驶过程中的紧急情况有时会迫使驾驶员做出突然的决定。预测这些决策将在更新保险应用中的风险分析方面具有重要应用,同时也可以为起草自动驾驶车辆指南提供深入的见解。然而,在实验环境中研究这种行为受到伦理问题的限制,因为这会危及人们的生命。在这里,我们利用虚拟现实(VR)的潜力来研究在一种极端情况下的决策,即在这种情况下,参与者必须牺牲他人才能拯救自己。在 VR 驾驶模拟中,参与者首先接受训练,以完成一个具有多个十字路口的困难课程,其中错误的转弯会导致汽车坠落悬崖。在测试阶段,十字路口的“安全”转弯处突然出现障碍物:对于对照组,障碍物由树木组成,而对于实验组,障碍物是行人。在两组中,驾驶员都必须在坠落悬崖或与障碍物碰撞之间做出选择。结果表明,个性特征的差异能够预测这一决策:在实验组中,与行人碰撞的驾驶员具有明显更高的精神病态和冲动特质,而在对照组中,冲动特质在一定程度上具有预测性。其他因素,如心率差异、性别、电子游戏专业知识和驾驶经验,在两组中都不能预测紧急决策。我们的研究结果表明,在极端情况下选择自我保护或他人保护时,与自我利益相关的个性特征会影响决策,并展示了虚拟现实在研究和模拟人类决策方面的潜力。

相似文献

1
You or Me? Personality Traits Predict Sacrificial Decisions in an Accident Situation.你还是我?人格特质预测事故情境中的牺牲决策。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2019 May;25(5):1898-1907. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2899227. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
2
To Brake or Not to Brake? Personality Traits Predict Decision-Making in an Accident Situation.刹车还是不刹车?人格特质预测事故情境中的决策。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 5;10:134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00134. eCollection 2019.
3
Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles.在道德困境中,人类的决策在很大程度上由功利主义描述:虚拟汽车驾驶研究为自动驾驶车辆提供了指导方针。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):399-418. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0020-x. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
4
Exploring the use of computer games and virtual reality in exposure therapy for fear of driving following a motor vehicle accident.探索电脑游戏和虚拟现实技术在机动车事故后恐驾暴露疗法中的应用。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003 Jun;6(3):329-34. doi: 10.1089/109493103322011641.
5
Risks to pedestrians in traffic systems with unfamiliar driving rules: a virtual reality approach.具有陌生驾驶规则的交通系统中对行人的风险:一种虚拟现实方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105565. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105565. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Deciding when to cross in front of an autonomous vehicle: How child and adult pedestrians respond to eHMI timing and vehicle kinematics.决定何时在自动驾驶车前穿行:儿童和成人行人对 eHMI 计时和车辆运动学的反应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Jul;202:107567. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107567. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
7
The Personal Autonomous Car: Personality and the Driverless Car.《个人自主驾驶汽车:个性与无人驾驶汽车》。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Apr;23(4):242-245. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0544. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
8
Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?驾驶配备部分自主式前方碰撞预警系统的汽车:驾驶员的反应如何?
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):698-708. doi: 10.1177/0018720812439712.
9
Predicting driving speed from psychological metrics in a virtual reality car driving simulation.从虚拟现实汽车驾驶模拟中的心理指标预测驾驶速度。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 16;12(1):10044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14409-1.
10
Investigating the effect of personality on left-turn behaviors in various scenarios to understand the dynamics of driving styles.研究人格在不同场景下对左转行为的影响,以了解驾驶风格的动态。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(8):801-806. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1673893. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Willingness to take responsibility: Self-sacrifice versus sacrificing others in takeover decisions during autonomous driving.承担责任的意愿:自动驾驶过程中接管决策中的自我牺牲与牺牲他人。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(9):e29616. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29616. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
Relationship between virtual reality balloon analogue risk task and risky decision-making.虚拟现实气球模拟风险任务与冒险决策之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0282097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282097. eCollection 2023.
3
Predicting driving speed from psychological metrics in a virtual reality car driving simulation.
从虚拟现实汽车驾驶模拟中的心理指标预测驾驶速度。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 16;12(1):10044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14409-1.