Kobayashi Yoshiomi, Matsumaru Satoshi, Kuramoto Tetsuya, Nagoshi Narihito, Iwanami Akio, Tsuji Osahiko, Okada Eijiro, Fujita Nobuyuki, Yagi Mitsuru, Tsuji Takashi, Ogawa Jun, Nakamura Masaya, Masumoto Morio, Ishii Ken, Watanabe Kota
Spine Center, Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo.
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 May;32(4):E177-E182. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000790.
Retrospective study.
To compare outcomes for plate fixation versus suture suspension in expansive open-door laminoplasty (ELAP) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
C5 palsy and laminar closure have been reported to occur after ELAP when suture suspension is used to anchor the opened lamina.
We assessed 174 patients with CSM who were treated by ELAP using either suture suspension (114 patients, mean age 63.3 y, 83 men and 31 women, mean follow-up 12.0 mo) or laminoplasty plate (60 patients, mean age 65.6 y, 45 men and 15 women, mean follow-up 12.6 mo) to maintain the position of the opened laminae. We compared clinical outcomes, radiographic findings, and complications between the 2 groups.
Mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores had improved significantly for both groups at the final follow-up (P<0.001), with similar recovery rates: scores improved from 10.8±2.8 to 13.4±2.8 points in the suture-suspension (SS) group and from 11.3±2.7 to 13.6±2.2 points in the laminoplasty plate (LP) group. The incidence of C5 palsy was significantly higher in the SS group (7.9%) than in the LP group (1.7%; P<0.05). Computed tomography (CT) showed larger mean angles of the opened laminae in the SS group compared with the LP group (P<0.01). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed that the mean anterior spinal-cord space at the C5 level was larger in the SS group than in the LP group (P<0.01).
Plate fixation in ELAP produced comparable clinical outcomes and significantly lowered the incidence of C5 palsy compared with suture suspension. CT and MRI findings indicated that laminoplasty plate fixation prevented excessive opening of the lamina and decreased dorsal spinal-cord shift, which might explain the lower incidence of C5 palsy.
回顾性研究。
比较颈椎前路扩大开门成形术(ELAP)治疗脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)时钢板固定与缝线悬吊的疗效。
据报道,采用缝线悬吊固定打开的椎板后,ELAP术后会发生C5麻痹和椎板闭合。
我们评估了174例接受ELAP治疗的CSM患者,其中114例采用缝线悬吊(平均年龄63.3岁,男83例,女31例,平均随访12.0个月),60例采用椎板成形钢板(平均年龄65.6岁,男45例,女15例,平均随访12.6个月)来维持打开椎板的位置。我们比较了两组的临床疗效、影像学表现和并发症。
末次随访时两组日本骨科协会平均评分均显著改善(P<0.001),恢复率相似:缝线悬吊(SS)组评分从10.8±2.8分提高到13.4±2.8分,椎板成形钢板(LP)组从11.3±2.7分提高到13.6±2.2分。SS组C5麻痹发生率(7.9%)显著高于LP组(1.7%;P<0.05)。计算机断层扫描(CT)显示,SS组打开椎板的平均角度大于LP组(P<0.01)。磁共振成像(MRI)显示,SS组C5水平脊髓前间隙平均宽度大于LP组(P<0.01)。
与缝线悬吊相比,ELAP术中钢板固定产生了相当的临床疗效,并显著降低了C5麻痹的发生率。CT和MRI结果表明,椎板成形钢板固定可防止椎板过度打开,并减少脊髓背侧移位,这可能解释了C5麻痹发生率较低的原因。