Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406, Jiefang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300000, China.
Department of Internal Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300000, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jun 3;17(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03188-0.
During open-door laminoplasty, the position of the bone gutter is not fixed, and when the gutter migrates inward, the outer end of the titanium plate must be fixed on the lamina edge. It is unclear whether this will affect the clinical efficacy. This study aimed to observe the influence of the titanium plate fixation position on the effectiveness of open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
A total of 98 patients with CSM who underwent open-door laminoplasty from August 2016 to October 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Fifty-five patients had the titanium plate fixed on the lateral mass (lateral mass group), and 43 patients had the titanium plate fixed on the lamina edge (lamina group). The opening angle, opening width, occurrence of hinge fracture, spinal cord drift distance, cervical curvature index (CCI), neurological function recovery (JOA score), neck function (NDI), C5 palsy and severity of axial symptoms were observed and compared between the two groups.
The opening angle in the lamina group was significantly larger than that in the lateral mass group, while the opening width and the spinal cord drift distance were significantly smaller than those in the lateral mass group (P < 0.05). The occurrence of hinge fracture in the lamina group was significantly higher than that in the lateral group (25.6% and 9.1%, respectively) (P < 0.05). The CCI was maintained well in both groups (P > 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). After surgery, the JOA score significantly increased in both groups (P < 0.05), and the neurological recovery rates were similar between the two groups (62.6% vs. 64.5%). The NDI score significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.05), but the lateral mass group recovered to a greater degree than the lamina group (P < 0.05). The occurrence of C5 palsy was 2.3% in the lamina group and 14.5% in the lateral mass group, and there was a significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05). Postoperative axial symptom severity was significantly worse in the lamina group than in the lateral mass group (P < 0.05).
In open-door laminoplasty, it is feasible to fix the titanium plate on the lateral mass or to the lamina due to the same neurological function recovery. However, fixing it to the lamina will increase the opening angle and decrease the opening width, making the hinge prone to fracture and increasing the severity of postoperative axial symptoms.
开门式椎管成形术中,骨槽位置不固定,当骨槽向内迁移时,钛板的外端必须固定在椎板边缘。目前尚不清楚这是否会影响临床疗效。本研究旨在观察钛板固定位置对颈椎脊髓病(CSM)开门式椎管成形术疗效的影响。
回顾性分析 2016 年 8 月至 2019 年 10 月期间接受开门式椎管成形术的 98 例 CSM 患者。55 例患者的钛板固定于侧块(侧块组),43 例患者的钛板固定于椎板边缘(椎板组)。观察并比较两组患者的开门角度、开门宽度、铰链骨折发生情况、脊髓漂移距离、颈椎曲度指数(CCI)、神经功能恢复(JOA 评分)、颈部功能(NDI)、C5 瘫痪和轴向症状严重程度。
椎板组的开门角度明显大于侧块组,而开门宽度和脊髓漂移距离明显小于侧块组(P<0.05)。椎板组铰链骨折的发生率明显高于侧块组(25.6%和 9.1%)(P<0.05)。两组 CCI 均保持良好(P>0.05),组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。术后两组的 JOA 评分均明显升高(P<0.05),两组神经恢复率相似(62.6%比 64.5%)。两组的 NDI 评分均明显降低(P<0.05),但侧块组的恢复程度大于椎板组(P<0.05)。椎板组 C5 瘫痪发生率为 2.3%,侧块组为 14.5%,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。椎板组术后轴向症状严重程度明显高于侧块组(P<0.05)。
在开门式椎管成形术中,将钛板固定于侧块或椎板均可获得相同的神经功能恢复效果。然而,将其固定于椎板会增加开门角度,减小开门宽度,使铰链更易发生骨折,并增加术后轴向症状的严重程度。