Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Nov;19(11):701-710. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0068-2.
Cognitive ageing research examines the cognitive abilities that are preserved and/or those that decline with advanced age. There is great individual variability in cognitive ageing trajectories. Some older adults show little decline in cognitive ability compared with young adults and are thus termed 'optimally ageing'. By contrast, others exhibit substantial cognitive decline and may develop dementia. Human neuroimaging research has led to a number of important advances in our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying these two outcomes. However, interpreting the age-related changes and differences in brain structure, activation and functional connectivity that this research reveals is an ongoing challenge. Ambiguous terminology is a major source of difficulty in this venture. Three terms in particular - compensation, maintenance and reserve - have been used in a number of different ways, and researchers continue to disagree about the kinds of evidence or patterns of results that are required to interpret findings related to these concepts. As such inconsistencies can impede progress in both theoretical and empirical research, here, we aim to clarify and propose consensual definitions of these terms.
认知老化研究旨在探究随年龄增长而得以保持和/或衰退的认知能力。认知老化轨迹在个体间存在极大差异。一些老年人的认知能力与年轻人相比几乎没有下降,因此被称为“最优老化”。相比之下,另一些老年人则表现出明显的认知能力下降,甚至可能发展为痴呆症。人类神经影像学研究使我们对这两种结果背后的神经机制有了更深入的了解。然而,解释该研究揭示的与年龄相关的大脑结构、激活和功能连接变化是一个持续存在的挑战。模糊的术语是该研究中的主要难点之一。补偿、维持和储备这三个术语已经以多种不同的方式使用,研究人员在解释与这些概念相关的发现所需的证据类型或结果模式方面仍存在分歧。由于这些不一致会阻碍理论和实证研究的进展,因此,我们旨在澄清并提出这些术语的共识定义。