Suppr超能文献

通过政治领袖和文化机构的语言来考察政治和文化的长期趋势。

Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712;

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 26;116(9):3476-3481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811987116. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

Abstract

From many perspectives, the election of Donald Trump was seen as a departure from long-standing political norms. An analysis of Trump's word use in the presidential debates and speeches indicated that he was exceptionally informal but at the same time, spoke with a sense of certainty. Indeed, he is lower in analytic thinking and higher in confidence than almost any previous American president. Closer analyses of linguistic trends of presidential language indicate that Trump's language is consistent with long-term linear trends, demonstrating that he is not as much an outlier as he initially seems. Across multiple corpora from the American presidents, non-US leaders, and legislative bodies spanning decades, there has been a general decline in analytic thinking and a rise in confidence in most political contexts, with the largest and most consistent changes found in the American presidency. The results suggest that certain aspects of the language style of Donald Trump and other recent leaders reflect long-evolving political trends. Implications of the changing nature of popular elections and the role of media are discussed.

摘要

从多个角度来看,唐纳德·特朗普的当选被视为背离了长期以来的政治规范。对特朗普在总统辩论和演讲中用词的分析表明,他异常不拘小节,但同时又表现出一种确定性。事实上,他的分析性思维低于几乎所有前任美国总统,而自信心则高于他们。对总统语言的语言趋势进行更深入的分析表明,特朗普的语言与长期的线性趋势一致,这表明他并不像最初看起来那样是个异类。在跨越几十年的来自美国总统、非美国领导人以及立法机构的多个语料库中,在大多数政治背景下,分析性思维普遍下降,而自信心普遍上升,其中在美国总统职位上发现的变化最大且最一致。研究结果表明,唐纳德·特朗普和其他近期领导人的某些语言风格反映了长期以来不断演变的政治趋势。讨论了民意选举性质的变化以及媒体的作用所产生的影响。

相似文献

1
Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 26;116(9):3476-3481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811987116. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
2
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
3
Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 8;118(23). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024125118.
4
Changes in Americans' prejudices during the presidency of Donald Trump.
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 May;6(5):656-665. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01287-2. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
5
A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Jan;63(1):3-19. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12679. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
7
Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114417. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114417. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
9
Racism in Trump's America: reflections on culture, sociology, and the 2016 US presidential election.
Br J Sociol. 2017 Nov;68 Suppl 1:S85-S104. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12324.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting depression in speech using verbal behavior analysis: a cross-cultural study.
Front Psychol. 2025 May 29;16:1514918. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1514918. eCollection 2025.
3
Enough Terror to Belong: The Nonlinear Association of Death Anxiety with Group Identification.
Depress Anxiety. 2024 May 21;2024:3699789. doi: 10.1155/2024/3699789. eCollection 2024.
4
A transparency statement improves trust in community-police interactions.
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 7;16(1):2285. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55709-6.
5
A randomized controlled trial of a compassion-centered spiritual health intervention to improve hospital inpatient outcomes.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 3;20(3):e0313602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313602. eCollection 2025.
7
Quantifying the uniqueness and divisiveness of presidential discourse.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 7;3(10):pgae431. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae431. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
How developments in natural language processing help us in understanding human behaviour.
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Oct;8(10):1877-1889. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01938-0. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
9
Expressions of uncertainty in online science communication hinder information diffusion.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 4;3(10):pgae439. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae439. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
From complexity to clarity: How AI enhances perceptions of scientists and the public's understanding of science.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 6;3(9):pgae387. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae387. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Diurnal variations of psychometric indicators in Twitter content.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0197002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197002. eCollection 2018.
2
Searching for God: Illness-Related Mortality Threats and Religious Search Volume in Google in 16 Nations.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar;44(3):290-303. doi: 10.1177/0146167217736047. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
3
Did Shakespeare write double falsehood? Identifying individuals by creating psychological signatures with text analysis.
Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):570-82. doi: 10.1177/0956797614566658. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
4
When small words foretell academic success: the case of college admissions essays.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e115844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115844. eCollection 2014.
5
Linguistic features of power dynamics in triadic dementia diagnostic conversations.
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.020. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
6
The language of online leadership: gender and youth engagement on the internet.
Dev Psychol. 2006 May;42(3):436-49. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.436.
7
Things I've learned about personality from studying political leaders at a distance.
J Pers. 2005 Jun;73(3):557-84; discussion 553-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00321.x.
8
In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Oct;7(10):454-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012.
10
Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;81(2):247-62. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.247.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验