• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

别哭!情境需求对人际情绪调节的影响。

Stop crying! The impact of situational demands on interpersonal emotion regulation.

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2019 Dec;33(8):1587-1598. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1585330. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2019.1585330
PMID:30810482
Abstract

Crying is a common response to emotional distress that elicits support from the environment. People may regulate another's crying in several ways, such as by providing socio-affective support (e.g. comforting) or cognitive support (e.g. reappraisal), or by trying to emotionally disengage the other by suppression or distraction. We examined whether people adapt their interpersonal emotion regulation strategies to the situational context, by manipulating the regulatory demand of the situation in which someone is crying. Participants watched a video of a crying man and provided support by recording a video message. We hypothesised that when immediate down-regulation was required (i.e. high regulatory demand), participants would provide lower levels of socio-affective and cognitive support, and instead distract the crying person or encourage them to suppress their emotions, compared to when there is no such urgency (i.e. low regulatory demand). As predicted, both self-reported and behavioural responses indicated that high (as compared to low) regulatory demand led to a reduction in socio-affective support provision, and a strong increase in suppression and distraction. Cognitive support provision, however, was unaffected by regulatory demand. When the context required more immediate down-regulation, participants thus employed more regulation strategies aimed at disengaging from the emotional experience. This study provides a first step in showing that people take the context into account when attempting to regulate others' emotions.

摘要

哭泣是一种常见的情绪困扰反应,可以从环境中获得支持。人们可以通过多种方式调节他人的哭泣,例如提供社会情感支持(例如安慰)或认知支持(例如重新评价),或者通过抑制或分散注意力来试图使对方情感上脱离。我们通过操纵哭泣者所处情境的调节需求,考察了人们是否会根据情境来调整人际情绪调节策略。参与者观看了一个哭泣男子的视频,并通过录制视频消息提供支持。我们假设,当需要立即进行调节时(即高调节需求),与没有这种紧迫性时相比(即低调节需求),参与者会提供较低水平的社会情感和认知支持,而是分散哭泣者的注意力或鼓励他们抑制情绪。正如所预测的那样,无论是自我报告的还是行为反应都表明,高(与低相比)调节需求会导致社会情感支持的提供减少,而抑制和分散注意力的强烈增加。然而,认知支持的提供不受调节需求的影响。因此,当情境需要更立即的调节时,参与者会采用更多旨在脱离情绪体验的调节策略。这项研究首次表明,人们在试图调节他人情绪时会考虑到情境。

相似文献

1
Stop crying! The impact of situational demands on interpersonal emotion regulation.别哭!情境需求对人际情绪调节的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Dec;33(8):1587-1598. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1585330. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
2
"Tears of joy" & "smiles of joy" prompt distinct patterns of interpersonal emotion regulation.“喜悦的泪水”和“喜悦的微笑”引发了不同的人际情绪调节模式。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Aug;32(5):913-940. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1360253. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
3
Emotion regulation of others' positive and negative emotions is related to distinct patterns of heart rate variability and situational empathy.他人正性和负性情绪的情绪调节与心率变异性和情境同理心的不同模式有关。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244427. eCollection 2020.
4
Does crying help? Development of the beliefs about crying scale (BACS).哭泣有帮助吗?哭泣信念量表(BACS)的编制。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Jun;33(4):722-736. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1488243. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
5
Do habitual emotional suppression measures predict response-focused situational suppression during social interactions?习惯性情绪抑制措施是否能预测社交互动中以反应为焦点的情境性抑制?
Emotion. 2020 Sep;20(6):1005-1019. doi: 10.1037/emo0000620. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
6
Experimental manipulation of emotion regulation changes mothers' physiological and facial expressive responses to infant crying.情绪调节的实验性操控改变了母亲对婴儿啼哭的生理和面部表情反应。
Infant Behav Dev. 2019 May;55:22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
7
Knowing me, knowing you: Are people good at regulating their emotions good at regulating another's emotions?了解我,了解你:善于调节自身情绪的人也善于调节他人的情绪吗?
Emotion. 2024 Aug;24(5):1137-1148. doi: 10.1037/emo0001305. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
8
Neural correlates of immediate and prolonged effects of cognitive reappraisal and distraction on emotional experience.认知重评和分心对情绪体验的即时和长期影响的神经相关物。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Oct;11(5):1227-1237. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9603-9.
9
Interpersonal physiological regulation during couple support interactions: Examining the role of respiratory sinus arrhythmia and emotional support.夫妻支持互动中的人际生理调节:呼吸窦性心律失常和情感支持的作用研究。
Psychophysiology. 2019 Nov;56(11):e13443. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13443. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
10
Interpersonal emotion regulation.人际情绪调节。
Emotion. 2013 Oct;13(5):803-10. doi: 10.1037/a0033839.

引用本文的文献

1
How to Improve Others' Emotions: Reappraise and be Responsive.如何改善他人的情绪:重新评估并做出回应。
Affect Sci. 2023 Apr 15;4(2):233-247. doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00183-4. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
The Influence of Personality on Interpersonal Emotion Regulation in the Context of Psychosocial Stress.人格对心理社会应激中人际情绪调节的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3073. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043073.
3
Tears of Joy as an Emotional Expression of the Meaning of Life.喜悦的泪水作为对生命意义的一种情感表达。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 8;13:792580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792580. eCollection 2022.
4
The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employees' Work Procrastination Behavior.虐待性监督对员工工作拖延行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 28;12:596704. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596704. eCollection 2021.
5
The Impact of Non-normative Displays of Emotion in the Workplace: How Inappropriateness Shapes the Interpersonal Outcomes of Emotional Displays.工作场所中情绪的非规范表达的影响:不适当性如何塑造情绪表达的人际结果。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 14;11:6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00006. eCollection 2020.