Suppr超能文献

群居或传统栓系厩/箱式饲养的骑术学校马匹的健康与身体状况

Health and Body Conditions of Riding School Horses Housed in Groups or Kept in Conventional Tie-Stall/Box Housing.

作者信息

Yngvesson Jenny, Rey Torres Juan Carlos, Lindholm Jasmine, Pättiniemi Annika, Andersson Petra, Sassner Hanna

机构信息

Department of Animal Environment & Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O.B. 234, SE-53223 Skara, Sweden.

Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, P.O.B. 100, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2019 Feb 26;9(3):73. doi: 10.3390/ani9030073.

Abstract

We compared welfare measures of horses among Swedish riding schools (RS) during winter where horses were kept either in group housing ( = 8) or in tie-stalls/boxes ( = 8), Health data for six previous months were obtained for all horses at each RS from their records. Ten horses per RS were examined, with the exception of one where only 8 horses were examined. Health conditions and body condition score (BCS) using the Henneke scale were recorded and management factors were quantified (health check routines, feeding, housing-related risk factors, time outside). RS-recorded health data (for 327 horses in total) revealed that lameness was the most common issue in both systems. Respiratory problems and colic were significantly more common in tie-stall/box horses. The percentage of horses with respiratory problems (mean ± SEM) was 5.8 ± 1.4 in tie-stall/box systems and 1.1 ± 0.8 in group housing (F = 8.65, = 0.01). The percentage with colic was 2.38 ± 0.62 in tie-stall/box systems and 0.38 ± 0.26 in group housing (F = 8.62, = 0.01). Clinical examination of 158 horses revealed 207 conditions in these horses, the most common being minor skin injuries in areas affected by tack (i.e., saddle and bridle, including bit). Such injuries tended to be more prevalent in horses housed in tie-stalls/boxes (1.8 ± 0.6) than in group housing (0.5 ± 0.3) (F=3.14, = 0.01). BCS was similar between systems (tie-stall/box 6.2 ± 0.1, group 6.3 ± 0.1), but the average BCS exceeded the level that is considered optimal (BCS 4⁻6). In conclusion, we found that Swedish RS horses are generally in good health, particularly when group-housed. However, 25%⁻32% were overweight. Riding schools would thus benefit from having an independent feeding expert performing regular body condition scoring of all horses and advising on feeding regimens.

摘要

我们比较了瑞典马术学校(RS)冬季马匹的福利措施,这些马匹分别饲养在群居舍(n = 8)或拴马厩/单间(n = 8)中。从每个RS的记录中获取了所有马匹前六个月的健康数据。每个RS检查了10匹马,但有一个RS只检查了8匹马。记录了马匹的健康状况和使用亨内克量表的体况评分(BCS),并对管理因素进行了量化(健康检查程序、喂食、与住房相关的风险因素、户外活动时间)。RS记录的健康数据(总共327匹马)显示,跛行是两种饲养系统中最常见的问题。呼吸问题和绞痛在拴马厩/单间饲养的马匹中明显更为常见。拴马厩/单间系统中出现呼吸问题的马匹百分比(平均值±标准误)为5.8±1.4,群居舍中为1.1±0.8(F = 8.65,P = 0.01)。绞痛的百分比在拴马厩/单间系统中为2.38±0.62,群居舍中为0.38±0.26(F = 8.62,P = 0.01)。对158匹马的临床检查发现这些马存在207种状况,最常见的是受马具影响区域(即马鞍和缰绳,包括马嚼子)的轻微皮肤损伤。此类损伤在拴马厩/单间饲养的马匹中(1.8±0.6)往往比群居舍中的马匹(0.5±0.3)更为普遍(F = 3.14,P = 0.01)。两种系统的BCS相似(拴马厩/单间6.2±0.1,群居舍6.3±0.1),但平均BCS超过了被认为是最佳水平的范围(BCS 4 - 6)。总之,我们发现瑞典RS的马匹总体健康状况良好,尤其是群居饲养时。然而,25% - 32%的马匹超重。因此,马术学校将受益于聘请独立的喂养专家对所有马匹定期进行体况评分并就喂养方案提供建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1911/6466050/6e0531a2d753/animals-09-00073-g001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Risk factors of colic in horses in Austria.奥地利马匹绞痛的风险因素。
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2009 Jun;93(3):339-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2008.00874.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验