State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Microbiome. 2019 Feb 27;7(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0647-0.
Agricultural food production is at the base of food and fodder, with fertilization having fundamentally and continuously increased crop yield over the last decades. The performance of crops is intimately tied to their microbiome as they together form holobionts. The importance of the microbiome for plant performance is, however, notoriously ignored in agricultural systems as fertilization disconnects the dependency of plants for often plant-beneficial microbial processes. Moreover, we lack a holistic understanding of how fertilization regimes affect the soil microbiome. Here, we examined the effect of a 2-year fertilization regime (no nitrogen fertilization control, nitrogen fertilization, and nitrogen fertilization plus straw amendment) on entire soil microbiomes (bacteria, fungi, and protist) in three common agricultural soil types cropped with maize in two seasons.
We found that the application of nitrogen fertilizers more strongly affected protist than bacterial and fungal communities. Nitrogen fertilization indirectly reduced protist diversity through changing abiotic properties and bacterial and fungal communities which differed between soil types and sampling seasons. Nitrogen fertilizer plus straw amendment had greater effects on soil physicochemical properties and microbiome diversity than nitrogen addition alone. Moreover, nitrogen fertilization, even more together with straw, increased soil microbiome network complexity, suggesting that the application of nitrogen fertilizers tightened soil microbiomes interactions.
Together, our results suggest that protists are the most susceptible microbiome component to the application of nitrogen fertilizers. As protist communities also exhibit the strongest seasonal dynamics, they serve as the most sensitive bioindicators of soil changes. Changes in protist communities might have long-term effects if some of the key protist hubs that govern microbiome complexities as top microbiome predators are altered. This study serves as the stepping stone to promote protists as promising agents in targeted microbiome engineering to help in reducing the dependency on exogenous unsustainably high fertilization and pesticide applications.
农业粮食生产是食物和饲料的基础,施肥在过去几十年中从根本上持续提高了作物产量。由于作物与其微生物组共同形成了整体共生体,因此它们的表现与微生物组密切相关。然而,由于施肥使植物与通常对植物有益的微生物过程脱钩,农业系统中植物对微生物组的重要性被严重忽视。此外,我们缺乏对施肥制度如何影响土壤微生物组的整体理解。在这里,我们研究了为期两年的施肥制度(不施氮肥对照、施氮肥和施氮肥加秸秆添加)对三种常见农业土壤类型中种植玉米的两个季节的整个土壤微生物组(细菌、真菌和原生动物)的影响。
我们发现,施氮肥对原生动物的影响比细菌和真菌群落更强。氮施肥通过改变生物物理特性和细菌和真菌群落间接降低了原生动物的多样性,而这些群落因土壤类型和采样季节而异。氮肥加秸秆添加比单独添加氮肥对土壤理化性质和微生物组多样性的影响更大。此外,氮施肥,甚至与秸秆一起,增加了土壤微生物组网络的复杂性,表明氮施肥加强了土壤微生物组的相互作用。
总的来说,我们的结果表明,原生动物是最容易受到氮施肥应用影响的微生物组组成部分。由于原生动物群落也表现出最强的季节性动态,因此它们是土壤变化最敏感的生物指标。如果一些控制微生物组复杂性的关键原生动物中心(作为顶级微生物捕食者)发生改变,原生动物群落的变化可能会产生长期影响。本研究为促进原生动物作为有前途的靶向微生物组工程代理提供了一个契机,以帮助减少对外部不可持续的高施肥和农药应用的依赖。