Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom.
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada, and.
J Neurosci. 2019 May 1;39(18):3470-3483. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1370-17.2019. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is thought to learn the relationships between actions and their outcomes. But little is known about what changes to population activity in PFC are specific to learning these relationships. Here we characterize the plasticity of population activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) of male rats learning rules on a Y-maze. First, we show that the population always changes its patterns of joint activity between the periods of sleep either side of a training session on the maze, regardless of successful rule learning during training. Next, by comparing the structure of population activity in sleep and training, we show that this population plasticity differs between learning and nonlearning sessions. In learning sessions, the changes in population activity in post-training sleep incorporate the changes to the population activity during training on the maze. In nonlearning sessions, the changes in sleep and training are unrelated. Finally, we show evidence that the nonlearning and learning forms of population plasticity are driven by different neuron-level changes, with the nonlearning form entirely accounted for by independent changes to the excitability of individual neurons, and the learning form also including changes to firing rate couplings between neurons. Collectively, our results suggest two different forms of population plasticity in mPFC during the learning of action-outcome relationships: one a persistent change in population activity structure decoupled from overt rule-learning, and the other a directional change driven by feedback during behavior. The PFC is thought to represent our knowledge about what action is worth doing in which context. But we do not know how the activity of neurons in PFC collectively changes when learning which actions are relevant. Here we show, in a trial-and-error task, that population activity in PFC is persistently changing, regardless of learning. Only during episodes of clear learning of relevant actions are the accompanying changes to population activity carried forward into sleep, suggesting a long-lasting form of neural plasticity. Our results suggest that representations of relevant actions in PFC are acquired by reward imposing a direction onto ongoing population plasticity.
前额叶皮层(PFC)被认为是学习行为及其结果之间关系的区域。但是,对于 PFC 群体活动的变化哪些是专门用于学习这些关系的,人们知之甚少。在这里,我们描述了在雄性大鼠学习 Y 型迷宫规则时,内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)的群体活动的可塑性。首先,我们表明,无论在训练期间是否成功学习了规则,群体活动总是会在睡眠期间改变其在迷宫两侧训练期之间的联合活动模式。其次,通过比较睡眠和训练期间的群体活动结构,我们表明这种群体可塑性在学习和非学习期间是不同的。在学习期间,训练后睡眠中的群体活动变化包含了在迷宫训练期间的群体活动变化。在非学习期间,睡眠和训练中的变化是无关的。最后,我们有证据表明,群体可塑性的非学习和学习形式是由不同的神经元水平变化驱动的,非学习形式完全由单个神经元兴奋性的独立变化引起,而学习形式还包括神经元之间的放电率耦合的变化。总的来说,我们的结果表明,在学习行为-结果关系时,mPFC 中存在两种不同形式的群体可塑性:一种是与明显的规则学习无关的群体活动结构的持久变化,另一种是由行为期间的反馈驱动的有方向的变化。PFC 被认为代表了我们关于在何种情境下采取何种行动的知识。但是,我们不知道当学习哪些行动是相关的时,PFC 中的神经元活动是如何集体变化的。在这里,我们在一个试错任务中表明,无论学习与否,PFC 的群体活动都在持续变化。只有在明确学习相关动作的过程中,群体活动的伴随变化才会在睡眠中持续,这表明存在一种持久的神经可塑性。我们的结果表明,PFC 中相关动作的表示是通过奖励对正在进行的群体可塑性施加方向来获得的。