Hosking Anna-Marie, Juhasz Margit, Atanaskova Mesinkovska Natasha
Department of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Skin Appendage Disord. 2019 Feb;5(2):72-89. doi: 10.1159/000492035. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
The treatment of alopecia is limited by a lack of therapies that induce and sustain disease remission. Given the negative psychosocial impact of hair loss, patients that do not see significant hair restoration with conventional therapies often turn to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Although there are a variety of CAM treatment options on the market for alopecia, only a few are backed by multiple randomized controlled trials. Further, these modalities are not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and there is a lack of standardization of bioactive in gredients in over-the-counter vitamins, herbs, and supplements. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of CAM, including natural products and mind and body practices, in the treatment of hair loss. Overall, there is a need for additional studies investigating CAM for alopecia with more robust clinical design and standardized, quantitative outcomes.
脱发的治疗因缺乏能诱导并维持疾病缓解的疗法而受到限制。鉴于脱发对心理社会产生的负面影响,那些采用传统疗法后未见到明显头发再生的患者常常求助于补充和替代医学(CAM)。尽管市场上有多种用于治疗脱发的补充和替代医学治疗选择,但只有少数有多个随机对照试验作为支撑。此外,这些疗法不受美国食品药品监督管理局监管,非处方维生素、草药和补充剂中的生物活性成分缺乏标准化。在本文中,我们全面综述了补充和替代医学(包括天然产品以及身心疗法)在治疗脱发方面的疗效、安全性和耐受性。总体而言,需要开展更多研究,采用更严谨的临床设计以及标准化的定量结果来调查补充和替代医学治疗脱发的情况。