Ophthalmic Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Indiana University, School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Feb 28;60(3):M132-M160. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25955.
The evidence-basis based on existing myopia control trials along with the supporting academic literature were reviewed; this informed recommendations on the outcomes suggested from clinical trials aimed at slowing myopia progression to show the effectiveness of treatments and the impact on patients. These outcomes were classified as primary (refractive error and/or axial length), secondary (patient reported outcomes and treatment compliance), and exploratory (peripheral refraction, accommodative changes, ocular alignment, pupil size, outdoor activity/lighting levels, anterior and posterior segment imaging, and tissue biomechanics). The currently available instrumentation, which the literature has shown to best achieve the primary and secondary outcomes, was reviewed and critiqued. Issues relating to study design and patient selection were also identified. These findings and consensus from the International Myopia Institute members led to final recommendations to inform future instrumentation development and to guide clinical trial protocols.
对现有的近视控制试验以及相关学术文献的证据基础进行了回顾;根据临床试验中旨在减缓近视进展的结果建议,为治疗效果和对患者的影响提供了信息。这些结果分为主要(屈光不正和/或眼轴长度)、次要(患者报告的结果和治疗依从性)和探索性(周边屈光度、调节变化、眼球对准、瞳孔大小、户外活动/光照水平、前节和后节成像以及组织生物力学)。对文献中显示最能实现主要和次要结果的现有仪器进行了审查和评价。还确定了与研究设计和患者选择有关的问题。这些发现和国际近视研究所成员的共识导致了最终建议,以指导未来仪器的开发和临床试验方案。