Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Science and Research Center Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia.
Eur J Nutr. 2019 Mar;58(2):497-514. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-01937-2. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Athletes in Olympic combat sports experience body water fluctuations resulting from training and intentional dehydration when making weight. Despite the popularity of urine specific gravity (U) and urine osmolality (U) measurement in characterizing fluid fluctuations, their utility remains questioned. This systematic review/meta-analysis examined the utility of urinary hydration indices in laboratory and field settings in Olympic combat sport athletes.
27 articles met the inclusion criteria for systematic review, 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis; with U and U the main outcome variables. Meta-regression analyses evaluated the interrelationship among body mass (B), fluid intake, and urine measures.
Significant U alterations were observed following different sampling time frames: dehydration (ES 0.59; 95% CI 0.46-0.72; p = 0.001), follow-up period (ES 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.50; p = 0.002) and rehydration (ES - 0.34; 95% CI - 0.56 to - 0.12; p = 0.003). Direct comparison of laboratory (ES 0.20; 95% CI - 0.19 to 0.59; p = 0.324) and field (ES 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.56; p = 0.001) sampling showed marginally trivial and small effects. Small effects on U were observed following dehydration (ES 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.74, p = 0.15), follow-up period (ES 0.39; 95% CI 0.08-0.70, p = 0.015) and rehydration (ES - 0.45; 95% CI - 0.60 to 0.30, p = 0.001). Meta-regression analysis suggests only fluid intake predicts U alterations (p = 0.044) during rehydration protocols.
There were likely small changes in both U and U readings across all experimental conditions, with moderate-to-large heterogeneity in all studies, except for U readings during dehydration protocols. The meta-regression failed to provide conclusive evidence concerning the interrelationship among urine measures, B fluctuations, and fluid intake.
参加奥运会格斗类运动项目的运动员在训练和控制体重时会经历体液波动,包括脱水。尽管尿液比重(U)和尿液渗透压(U)测量在描述液体波动方面很受欢迎,但它们的实用性仍存在争议。本系统评价/荟萃分析检查了尿液水合指数在实验室和野外环境中对奥运格斗运动项目运动员的实用性。
27 篇文章符合系统评价的纳入标准,15 项研究被纳入荟萃分析;主要观察变量为 U 和 U。Meta 回归分析评估了体重(B)、液体摄入和尿液指标之间的相互关系。
不同采样时间框架下观察到 U 明显改变:脱水(ES0.59;95%CI0.46-0.72;p=0.001)、随访期(ES0.31;95%CI0.11-0.50;p=0.002)和再水合期(ES-0.34;95%CI-0.56 至-0.12;p=0.003)。实验室(ES0.20;95%CI-0.19 至 0.59;p=0.324)和野外(ES0.35;95%CI0.14-0.56;p=0.001)采样的直接比较显示出边缘微不足道和较小的影响。脱水(ES0.31;95%CI0.12-0.74;p=0.15)、随访期(ES0.39;95%CI0.08-0.70;p=0.015)和再水合期(ES-0.45;95%CI-0.60 至 0.30;p=0.001)后 U 的影响较小。Meta 回归分析表明,只有液体摄入可以预测再水合期 U 变化(p=0.044)。
在所有实验条件下,U 和 U 的读数都可能发生较小的变化,除了脱水期间的 U 读数外,所有研究都存在中度到高度的异质性。荟萃回归分析未能提供关于尿液指标、B 波动和液体摄入之间相互关系的明确证据。