Alexandre Nicolas M, Humphrey Parris T, Gloss Andrew D, Lee Jimmy, Frazier Joseph, Affeldt Henry A, Whiteman Noah K
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA.
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, Colorado 81224 USA.
Ecosphere. 2018 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2372. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
Plant distributions can be limited by habitat-biased herbivory, but the proximate causes of such biases are rarely known. Distinguishing plant-centric from herbivore-centric mechanisms driving differential herbivory between habitats is difficult without experimental manipulation of both plants and herbivores. Here we tested alternative hypotheses driving habitat-biased herbivory in bittercress (), which is more abundant under shade of shrubs and trees (shade) than in nearby meadows (sun) where herbivory is intense from the specialist fly . This system has served as a textbook example of habitat-biased herbivory driving a plant's distribution across an ecotone, but the proximate mechanisms underlying differential herbivory are still unclear. First, we found that higher herbivory in sun habitats contrasts sharply with their preference to attack plants from shade habitats in laboratory choice experiments. Second, strongly preferred leaves in simulated sun over simulated shade habitats, regardless of plant source habitat. Thus, herbivore preference for brighter, warmer habitats overrides their preference for more palatable shade plants. This promotes the sun-biased herbivore pressure that drives the distribution of bittercress into shade habitats.
植物分布可能会受到栖息地偏向性食草作用的限制,但这种偏向的直接原因却鲜为人知。在不对植物和食草动物进行实验操作的情况下,很难区分以植物为中心和以食草动物为中心的机制,这些机制导致了不同栖息地之间食草作用的差异。在这里,我们测试了驱动水芹栖息地偏向性食草作用的替代假设,水芹在灌木和树木的树荫下(阴凉处)比在附近食草作用强烈的草甸(阳光处)更为丰富,食草作用强烈是由专食性苍蝇造成的。这个系统一直是栖息地偏向性食草作用驱动植物在生态交错带分布的教科书式例子,但不同食草作用背后的直接机制仍不清楚。首先,我们发现阳光处栖息地较高的食草作用与它们在实验室选择实验中偏好攻击阴凉处栖息地的植物形成鲜明对比。其次,无论植物来源栖息地如何,[食草动物名称]在模拟阳光栖息地比模拟阴凉栖息地中强烈偏好叶片。因此,食草动物对更明亮、更温暖栖息地的偏好超过了它们对更可口的阴凉处植物的偏好。这促进了偏向阳光处的食草动物压力,这种压力驱使水芹分布到阴凉栖息地。