Menéndez-Espina Sara, Llosa Jose Antonio, Agulló-Tomás Esteban, Rodríguez-Suárez Julio, Sáiz-Villar Rosana, Lahseras-Díez Héctor Félix
Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Department of Health Sciences, International University of La Rioja (UNIR), La Rioja, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;10:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00286. eCollection 2019.
Job insecurity is a growing phenomenon, typical of an employment context characterised by high rates of temporary work and unemployment. Previous research has shown a direct relationship between job insecurity and mental health impairment. The present analysis goes into this relationship in depth, studying the moderating role of coping strategies and predicting that men and women implement different types of strategies. A sample of 1.008 workers is analysed, 588 women and 420 men. The Tobin CSI scale was used to analyse the coping strategies, in addition to JIS-8 to assess job insecurity, the MOS Perceived Social Support Survey and the GHQ-28 test to evaluate mental health. Then, a hierarchical linear regression was designed to study the moderating role of 8 coping strategies of job insecurity and 4 mental health subscales in men and women, separately. Results illustrate that coping strategies play a moderating role in the relationship between job insecurity and mental health. However, the aggravating role of disengagement coping strategies is more relevant than the buffering role of engagement strategies. On the other hand, women implement a greater number of coping strategies, with more positive results for mental health. Also, in the relationship between job insecurity and mental health the most important strategies are the ones related to social interaction inside and outside an organisation, and these are the main ones used by women. It therefore follows that strengthening rich social relationships inside and outside the working environment is a guarantee of well-being.
工作不安全感是一个日益普遍的现象,这在以高临时工率和高失业率为特征的就业环境中很典型。先前的研究表明工作不安全感与心理健康损害之间存在直接关系。本分析深入探讨了这种关系,研究应对策略的调节作用,并预测男性和女性会采用不同类型的策略。对1008名工人进行了分析,其中588名女性和420名男性。除了用JIS - 8评估工作不安全感、用MOS感知社会支持调查和GHQ - 28测试评估心理健康外,还用托宾CSI量表分析应对策略。然后,设计了分层线性回归,分别研究工作不安全感的8种应对策略和4种心理健康分量表在男性和女性中的调节作用。结果表明,应对策略在工作不安全感与心理健康之间的关系中起调节作用。然而,脱离应对策略的加剧作用比参与策略的缓冲作用更显著。另一方面,女性采用更多的应对策略,对心理健康有更积极的效果。此外,在工作不安全感与心理健康的关系中,最重要的策略是与组织内外社会互动相关的策略,而这些是女性主要采用的策略。因此,加强工作环境内外丰富的社会关系是幸福的保障。