Weinstein Adam S, Bader Angela M, Urman Richard D, Hepner David L, Fox John A
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, CWN-L1, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Cardiol Res. 2019 Feb;10(1):1-8. doi: 10.14740/cr821. Epub 2019 Feb 24.
The role of anesthesiologists has expanded from operating rooms to preoperative evaluation clinics. This role involves performing preoperative cardiovascular evaluation and optimization of patients before elective surgery, which can include ordering cardiac stress tests. We aimed to study the ordering patterns by anesthesiologists for preoperative cardiac stress tests, focusing on whether societal and institutional guidelines and recommendations were used. Choice of type of cardiac stress test was also examined.
A single center retrospective chart review from December 1, 2005 to May 31, 2015 was performed on 492 patients who had a cardiac stress test ordered by an anesthesiologist. Patients were categorized by indication for ordering the cardiac stress test based on societal practice guidelines, institutional guidelines or other relevant reasons at the time of patient encounter. Those "other" category cardiac stress tests were assessed for indication and evaluated by physician peer review to see if there was peer agreement for being appropriately ordered. Exercise electrocardiography (ECG) cardiac stress tests ordered were evaluated for appropriateness based on baseline resting ECG findings. Patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or right ventricular (RV) pacing were evaluated for appropriateness of proper cardiac stress test modality based on whether a pharmacological vasodilator cardiac stress test was ordered.
Analysis of the cardiac stress tests ordered showed that 43% were ordered according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, 29% were ordered according to institutional guidelines, and 28% were categorized as "other". Of the 28% "other" cardiac stress tests, 53% were in agreement for ordering by peer review. Sixty-four exercise ECG cardiac stress tests were ordered, of which 58% were appropriate based on having no baseline resting ECG abnormalities. Fifty-one patients were identified as having a resting ECG of LBBB or RV pacing of which 41% had an appropriate pharmacological vasodilator cardiac stress tests ordered.
Anesthesiologists order most preoperative cardiac stress tests according to professional societal or institutional guidelines (72%), yet they are not always choosing the best modality of cardiac stress test. A significant portion of cardiac stress tests are ordered (28%) based on clinical judgment, likely due to the lack of guidelines and recommendations being all-encompassing on many commonly encountered preoperative patient situations.
麻醉医生的职责范围已从手术室扩展至术前评估诊所。这一职责包括在择期手术前对患者进行术前心血管评估及优化,其中可能包括安排心脏负荷试验。我们旨在研究麻醉医生安排术前心脏负荷试验的模式,重点关注是否遵循了社会和机构的指南及建议。同时也对心脏负荷试验类型的选择进行了研究。
对2005年12月1日至2015年5月31日期间由麻醉医生安排进行心脏负荷试验的492例患者进行了单中心回顾性病历审查。根据社会执业指南、机构指南或患者就诊时的其他相关原因,对安排心脏负荷试验的指征进行分类。对那些“其他”类别的心脏负荷试验进行指征评估,并由医生同行评审,以确定同行是否认可其安排合理。根据静息心电图基线结果,对安排的运动心电图(ECG)心脏负荷试验的合理性进行评估。对于左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)或右心室(RV)起搏的患者,根据是否安排了药理学血管扩张剂心脏负荷试验,评估适当心脏负荷试验方式的合理性。
对所安排的心脏负荷试验分析显示,43%是根据美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南安排的,29%是根据机构指南安排的,28%被归类为“其他”。在28%的“其他”心脏负荷试验中,53%经同行评审认可安排合理。共安排了64例运动心电图心脏负荷试验,其中58%因静息心电图基线无异常而安排合理。确定51例患者静息心电图为LBBB或RV起搏,其中41%安排了适当的药理学血管扩张剂心脏负荷试验。
麻醉医生安排的大多数术前心脏负荷试验是根据专业社会或机构指南进行的(72%),但他们并不总是选择最佳的心脏负荷试验方式。相当一部分心脏负荷试验(28%)是基于临床判断安排的,这可能是由于指南和建议并未涵盖许多常见的术前患者情况。