Suppr超能文献

经右侧入路对孤立性永存左上腔静脉患者植入永久性起搏器:技术要点与随访结果

Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Isolated Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava From a Right-Sided Approach: Technical Considerations and Follow-Up Outcome.

作者信息

Sinha Santosh Kumar, Goel Amit, Razi Mahmodula, Jha Mukesh Jitendra, Mishra Vikas, Aggarwaal Puneet, Thakur Ramesh, Krishna Vinay, Pandey Umeshwar, Varma Chandra Mohan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Cardiol Res. 2019 Feb;10(1):18-23. doi: 10.14740/cr784. Epub 2019 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Positioning a permanent pacing wire in patients with persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) to right ventricle often comes as on-table surprise. It is technically demanding and therefore most of operators prefer left-sided approach. We assessed technical challenges during pacemaker implantation, and their short- and long-term outcomes among patients with isolated PLSVC from a right-sided approach.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive patients with isolated PLSVC and 93 patients with right superior vena cava (RSVC) were enrolled with syncope with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrioventricular (AV) block. Study was designed on the basis of nested case-control method, and therefore 1:3 proportions was the enrolment criteria to detect any difference as statistically significant as incidence of isolated PLSVC is low.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 64.8 ± 10.5 years. SND was the most common indication (n = 55; 44%) followed by AV block (n = 47; 37%). Nineteen (20%) patients received tined pacing lead, while 105 (85%) had screwing lead. There was no significant difference in mean procedural time (25 ± 11 min vs. 23 ± 12 min; P = 0.24), mean fluoroscopic time (3.1 ± 2.2 min vs. 2.7 ± 2.1 min; P = 0.54), pacing parameters for atrial and ventricular leads, dislodgement rate (3.2% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.32) and follow-up duration (6.9 ± 1.3 years vs. 7.2 ± 1.1 years; P = 0.18) between two groups. Compared to patients with RSVC, those with PLSVC had alpha loop configuration for ventricular lead which was statistically significant (31 vs. 00; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PLSVC had alpha loop configuration for ventricular lead because of circuitous course via left mediastinum. Although pacemaker implantation through coronary sinus via isolated PLSVC from right sided-approach is technically challenging, it obtains good long-term results but needs frequent follow-up during the initial period.

摘要

背景

在患有永久性左上腔静脉(PLSVC)的患者中将永久性起搏导线置于右心室,往往会在手术中带来意外情况。这在技术上要求很高,因此大多数操作者更喜欢采用左侧入路。我们评估了起搏器植入过程中的技术挑战,以及从右侧入路对孤立性PLSVC患者的短期和长期结果。

方法

连续纳入31例孤立性PLSVC患者和93例右上腔静脉(RSVC)患者,这些患者均因晕厥合并窦房结功能障碍(SND)和房室(AV)阻滞。研究基于巢式病例对照方法设计,由于孤立性PLSVC的发生率较低,因此1:3的比例是检测任何差异具有统计学意义的纳入标准。

结果

患者的平均年龄为64.8±10.5岁。SND是最常见的适应证(n = 55;44%),其次是AV阻滞(n = 47;37%)。19例(20%)患者接受了有倒刺的起搏导线,而105例(85%)患者使用了旋拧式导线。两组之间的平均手术时间(25±11分钟对23±12分钟;P = 0.24)、平均透视时间(3.1±2.2分钟对2.7±2.1分钟;P = 0.54)、心房和心室导线的起搏参数、脱位率(3.2%对4.8%;P = 0.32)以及随访时间(6.9±1.3年对7.2±1.1年;P = 0.18)均无显著差异。与RSVC患者相比,PLSVC患者的心室导线呈α环构型,差异具有统计学意义(31对00;P = 0.002)。

结论

PLSVC患者的心室导线呈α环构型是因为其经左纵隔走行迂曲。尽管通过右侧入路经孤立性PLSVC经冠状窦植入起搏器在技术上具有挑战性,但可获得良好的长期效果,但在初始阶段需要频繁随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验