Suppr超能文献

关于在集约化奶牛和肉牛养殖场研究野生鸟类与环境之间抗微生物药物耐药性肠道细菌传播的考量因素。

Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations.

作者信息

Tormoehlen Kristin, Johnson-Walker Yvette J, Lankau Emily W, Myint Maung San, Herrmann John A

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2019 Feb 27;7:e6460. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6460. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wild birds using livestock facilities for food and shelter may contribute to dissemination of enteric pathogens or antimicrobial resistant bacteria. However, drivers of microbial exchange among wildlife and livestock are not well characterized. Predisposition for acquiring and retaining environmental bacteria may vary among species because of physiologic or behavioral differences, complicating selection of a bacterial model that can accurately characterize microbial connections among hosts of interest. This study compares the prevalence and antibiotic resistance phenotypes of two potential model bacterial organisms isolated from wild birds and their environments.

METHODS

We compared prevalence and resistance profiles of and species isolated from environmental swabs and bird feces on a residential control site, a confinement dairy, a pasture-based beef farm, and a confinement beef farm.

RESULTS

Bird feces at all sites had low-to-moderate prevalence of (range: 17-47%), despite potential for exposure on farms (range: 63-97%). Few were isolated from the control environment. was dominant in birds at both beef farms (62% and 81% of isolates) and low-to-moderately prevalent at the dairy and control sites (29% and 23% of isolates, respectively). Antimicrobial resistance prevalence was higher in farm samples compared to those from the residential control, but distribution of resistant isolates varied between the bacterial genera. Birds on all farms carried resistant at similar rates to that of the environment, but resistance was less common in bird-associated despite presence of resistant isolates in the farm environment.

DISCUSSION

Bacterial species studied may affect how readily bacterial exchange among populations is detected. Selection of microbial models must carefully consider both the questions being posed and how findings might influence resulting management decisions.

摘要

背景

利用牲畜设施获取食物和庇护所的野生鸟类可能有助于肠道病原体或抗菌药物耐药菌的传播。然而,野生动物与牲畜之间微生物交换的驱动因素尚未得到充分描述。由于生理或行为差异,不同物种获取和保留环境细菌的倾向可能有所不同,这使得选择一个能够准确描述目标宿主之间微生物联系的细菌模型变得复杂。本研究比较了从野生鸟类及其环境中分离出的两种潜在模型细菌的流行率和抗生素耐药表型。

方法

我们比较了在一个住宅对照场所、一个圈养奶牛场、一个牧场型肉牛场和一个圈养肉牛场从环境拭子和鸟类粪便中分离出的[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]物种的流行率和耐药谱。

结果

尽管在农场有接触的可能性(范围:63 - 97%),但所有场所的鸟类粪便中[具体细菌名称1]的流行率为低到中等(范围:17 - 47%)。从对照环境中分离出的[具体细菌名称1]很少。[具体细菌名称2]在两个肉牛场的鸟类中占主导地位(分别占[具体细菌名称2]分离株的62%和81%),在奶牛场和对照场所的流行率为低到中等(分别占分离株的29%和23%)。与住宅对照样本相比,农场样本中的抗菌药物耐药流行率更高,但耐药分离株的分布在细菌属之间有所不同。所有农场的鸟类携带耐药[具体细菌名称1]的比例与环境相似,但尽管农场环境中存在耐药分离株,与鸟类相关的[具体细菌名称2]中的耐药情况较少见。

讨论

所研究的细菌物种可能会影响在种群间检测到细菌交换的难易程度。微生物模型的选择必须仔细考虑所提出的问题以及研究结果可能如何影响最终的管理决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f595/6397636/85d82712cc98/peerj-07-6460-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验