Morris Celeste, Wickramasingha Devinda, Abdelfattah Essam M, Pereira Richard V, Okello Emmanuel, Maier Gabriele
William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1086203. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1086203. eCollection 2023.
Antimicrobials are necessary for the treatment of bacterial infections in animals, but increased antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is becoming a concern for veterinarians and livestock producers. This cross-sectional study was conducted on cow-calf operations in northern California to assess prevalence of AMR in and spp. shed in feces of beef cattle of different life stages, breeds, and past antimicrobial exposures and to evaluate if any significant factors could be identified that are associated with AMR status of the isolates. A total of 244 and 238 isolates were obtained from cow and calf fecal samples, tested for susceptibility to 19 antimicrobials, and classified as resistant or non-susceptible to the antimicrobials for which breakpoints were available. For , percent of resistant isolates by antimicrobial were as follows: ampicillin 100% (244/244), sulfadimethoxine 25.4% (62/244), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 4.9% (12/244), and ceftiofur 0.4% (1/244) while percent of non-susceptible isolates by antimicrobial were: tetracycline 13.1% (32/244), and florfenicol 19.3% (47/244). For spp., percent of resistant isolates by antimicrobial were as follows: ampicillin 0.4% (1/238) while percent of non-susceptible isolates by antimicrobial were tetracycline 12.6% (30/238) and penicillin 1.7% (4/238). No animal level or farm level management practices, including antimicrobial exposures, were significantly associated with differences in isolate resistant or non-susceptible status for either or isolates. This is contrary to the suggestion that administration of antibiotics is solely responsible for development of AMR in exposed bacteria and demonstrates that there are other factors involved, either not captured in this study or not currently well understood. In addition, the overall use of antimicrobials in this cow-calf study was lower than other sectors of the livestock industry. Limited information is available on cow-calf AMR from fecal bacteria, and the results of this study serve as a reference for future studies to support a better understanding and estimation of drivers and trends for AMR in cow-calf operations.
抗菌药物对于治疗动物细菌感染是必要的,但日益增加的抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)正成为兽医和畜牧生产者关注的问题。这项横断面研究在加利福尼亚州北部的奶牛-犊牛养殖场开展,以评估不同生命阶段、品种和既往抗菌药物暴露情况的肉牛粪便中大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌属的AMR流行情况,并评估是否能识别出与分离株AMR状态相关的任何显著因素。从奶牛和犊牛粪便样本中总共获得了244株大肠杆菌和238株沙门氏菌属分离株,对其进行了19种抗菌药物的敏感性测试,并根据有可用断点的抗菌药物将其分类为耐药或不敏感。对于大肠杆菌,按抗菌药物分类的耐药分离株百分比如下:氨苄西林100%(244/244)、磺胺二甲氧嘧啶25.4%(62/244)、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑4.9%(12/244)、头孢噻呋0.4%(1/244),而按抗菌药物分类的不敏感分离株百分比为:四环素13.1%(32/244)、氟苯尼考19.3%(47/244)。对于沙门氏菌属,按抗菌药物分类的耐药分离株百分比如下:氨苄西林0.4%(1/238),而按抗菌药物分类的不敏感分离株百分比为四环素12.6%(30/238)、青霉素1.7%(4/238)。无论是大肠杆菌还是沙门氏菌属分离株,没有任何动物水平或农场水平的管理措施,包括抗菌药物暴露,与分离株的耐药或不敏感状态差异显著相关。这与抗生素给药是导致暴露细菌产生AMR的唯一原因这一观点相反,并表明还有其他因素参与其中,要么本研究未涵盖,要么目前尚未完全了解。此外,在这项奶牛-犊牛研究中抗菌药物的总体使用低于畜牧业的其他部门。关于奶牛-犊牛粪便细菌AMR的信息有限,本研究结果可为未来研究提供参考,以更好地理解和评估奶牛-犊牛养殖场AMR的驱动因素和趋势。