Department of Sport & Physical Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Scotland EH11 4BN, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 4;16(5):787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050787.
To examine the effects of short messaging service (SMS) frequency and timing on the efficacy of an SMS-intervention for Hong Kong Chinese adolescents, sixty nine students aged between 12 and 16 (mean age 13.75 ± 0.90) were recruited from five schools in Hong Kong. Participants were randomly assigned into one of five groups: high-frequency + self-selected timing (HST), low-frequency + self-selected timing (LST), high-frequency + assigned timing (HAT), low-frequency + assigned timing (LAT) and the control group. The total duration of the intervention was four weeks. No significant intervention effects were detected in adolescent's PA among the five groups (F = 1.14, = 0.346). No significant differences were observed in the stage movement among the five groups (² = 6.18, = 0.627). No significant differences appeared in the exercise benefits, barriers and benefits/barriers differential scores. However, a growth trend in the exercise benefits score in the LST and HAT groups was found in contrast to the downswing in the control group. The exercise barriers score in the HST group showed the largest reduction after intervention. The benefits/barriers differential score in all the intervention groups increased, whereas it decreased in the control group. Although an increase is demonstrated in the high dosage SMS frequency and timing, no significant intervention effects were found among the five groups in PA behavior, stage of change and exercise benefits and barriers among Hong Kong Chinese adolescents.
为了探究短信息服务(SMS)的频率和时间安排对香港青少年 SMS 干预效果的影响,从香港的五所学校招募了 69 名 12 至 16 岁(平均年龄 13.75 ± 0.90)的学生。参与者被随机分配到五个组中:高频率+自我选择时间(HST)、低频率+自我选择时间(LST)、高频率+指定时间(HAT)、低频率+指定时间(LAT)和对照组。干预总时长为四周。在五个组中,青少年的 PA 没有表现出显著的干预效果(F = 1.14,p = 0.346)。五个组的阶段运动没有观察到显著差异(² = 6.18,p = 0.627)。锻炼的益处、障碍和益处/障碍差异得分也没有显著差异。然而,与对照组的下降趋势相比,LST 和 HAT 组的锻炼益处得分呈现出增长趋势。干预后,HST 组的锻炼障碍得分降幅最大。所有干预组的益处/障碍差异得分均增加,而对照组则减少。尽管高剂量 SMS 的频率和时间安排有所增加,但在 PA 行为、改变阶段和锻炼益处和障碍方面,五个组之间没有发现显著的干预效果。