Suppr超能文献

口服新霉素和红霉素与单剂量全身应用甲硝唑及头孢曲松在择期结直肠手术中的预防性应用比较

Oral neomycin and erythromycin compared with single-dose systemic metronidazole and ceftriaxone prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.

作者信息

Weaver M, Burdon D W, Youngs D J, Keighley M R

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1986 Apr;151(4):437-42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90097-8.

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was performed to compare oral neomycin and erythromycin with single-dose intravenous metronidazole and ceftriaxone in elective colorectal surgery. The study was discontinued after 60 patients were entered. The overall rate of infection was 41 percent in the oral neomycin and erythromycin group (n = 29) compared with 9.6 percent in those who received intravenous metronidazole and ceftriaxone (n = 31) (p less than 0.01). Infections in the oral group were principally due to resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Bacteroides fragilis, and Escherichia coli. Preoperative administration of oral neomycin and erythromycin was associated with a significant reduction of Escherichia coli counts (1 X 10(7) to 3 X 10(5) organisms/ml, p less than 0.05) compared with the intravenous group, but there was no significant reduction in the counts of Bacteroides fragilis (2 X 10(8) to 1 X 10(7) organisms/ml) and there was an increase in the counts of Clostridia (2 X 10(4) to 1 X 10(6) organisms/ml). These results indicate that single-dose systemic prophylaxis with appropriate antibiotics is superior to oral neomycin and erythromycin.

摘要

进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,以比较口服新霉素和红霉素与单剂量静脉注射甲硝唑和头孢曲松在择期结直肠手术中的效果。在纳入60例患者后,该研究终止。口服新霉素和红霉素组(n = 29)的总体感染率为41%,而接受静脉注射甲硝唑和头孢曲松组(n = 31)的感染率为9.6%(p < 0.01)。口服组的感染主要由耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、脆弱拟杆菌和大肠杆菌引起。与静脉注射组相比,术前口服新霉素和红霉素可使大肠杆菌数量显著减少(从1×10⁷个菌/ml降至3×10⁵个菌/ml,p < 0.05),但脆弱拟杆菌数量无显著减少(从2×10⁸个菌/ml降至1×10⁷个菌/ml),梭菌数量增加(从2×10⁴个菌/ml增至1×10⁶个菌/ml)。这些结果表明,单剂量全身应用适当的抗生素预防优于口服新霉素和红霉素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验