Department of Neurology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France; Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.
Department of Neurosurgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France; Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences GIN-INSERM U1216/CEA/UGA, Grenoble, France; Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.
Brain Stimul. 2019 Jul-Aug;12(4):851-857. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a well-established treatment for motor complications in Parkinson disease (PD). Since 2012, the nonrechargeable dual-channel neurostimulator available in France seems to have shorter battery longevity compared to the same manufacturer's previous model.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the battery longevity of older and more recent neurostimulators from the same manufacturer and to explore factors associated with battery life variations.
We retrospectively studied our cohort of PD patients who underwent STN DBS between 1987 and 2017. We collected data concerning neurostimulator replacements and parameters. We compared the survival of the first device available, Kinetra and the current one, Activa-PC (Medtronic Inc.) and estimated the factors that had an impact on battery longevity through a Cox logistic regression.
Three hundred sixty-four PD patients received a total of 654 DBS STN neurostimulators: 317 Kinetra and 337 Activa-PC. The survival analysis, using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, showed a difference between the curves of the two devices (log-rank test; p < 0.001). The median survival of an Activa-PC neurostimulator was 1666 days, while it was 2379 days for a Kinetra. After adjustment, according to the multivariate analysis, the main factors associated with battery lifetime were: the neurostimulator type; the number of subsequent neurostimulator implantations; the total electrical energy delivered (TEED); and sex.
The Kinetra neurostimulator lifetime is 2.5 years longer than the Activa-PC. The type of the device, the high TEED and the number of subsequent neurostimulator implantations influence battery longevity most. These results have medical-economic implications since the survival of PD patients with DBS increases over years.
深脑刺激(DBS)的丘脑底核(STN)是一种成熟的治疗运动并发症的帕金森病(PD)。自 2012 年以来,法国提供的不可充电双通道神经刺激器似乎比同一家制造商的前一款型号电池寿命更短。
本研究的目的是评估来自同一家制造商的较旧和更新的神经刺激器的电池寿命,并探讨与电池寿命变化相关的因素。
我们回顾性研究了 1987 年至 2017 年间接受 STN-DBS 的 PD 患者队列。我们收集了有关神经刺激器更换和参数的数据。我们比较了第一代可用的 Kinetra 和当前的 Activa-PC(美敦力公司)的设备的生存情况,并通过 Cox 逻辑回归估计了对电池寿命有影响的因素。
364 名 PD 患者共接受了 654 个 STN-DBS 神经刺激器:317 个 Kinetra 和 337 个 Activa-PC。使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计器的生存分析显示两种设备的曲线存在差异(对数秩检验;p<0.001)。Activa-PC 神经刺激器的中位生存时间为 1666 天,而 Kinetra 为 2379 天。根据多变量分析调整后,与电池寿命相关的主要因素是:神经刺激器类型;随后进行的神经刺激器植入的数量;总电能量输送(TEED);和性别。
Kinetra 神经刺激器的寿命比 Activa-PC 长 2.5 年。设备类型、高 TEED 和随后进行的神经刺激器植入数量对电池寿命影响最大。这些结果具有医学经济学意义,因为 DBS 治疗的 PD 患者的生存率随着时间的推移而增加。