• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我是柏林人”:方言能力会影响对机器人的可信度和能力评估。 (注:原文中“Ick bin een Berlina”表述有误,正确的德语应该是“Ich bin ein Berliner” ,意思是“我是一个柏林人” )

"Ick bin een Berlina": dialect proficiency impacts a robot's trustworthiness and competence evaluation.

作者信息

Kühne Katharina, Herbold Erika, Bendel Oliver, Zhou Yuefang, Fischer Martin H

机构信息

Division of Cognitive Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

School of Business FHNW, Brugg-Windisch, Brugg, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2024 Jan 29;10:1241519. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1241519. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2023.1241519
PMID:38348348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10859411/
Abstract

Robots are increasingly used as interaction partners with humans. Social robots are designed to follow expected behavioral norms when engaging with humans and are available with different voices and even accents. Some studies suggest that people prefer robots to speak in the user's dialect, while others indicate a preference for different dialects. Our study examined the impact of the Berlin dialect on perceived trustworthiness and competence of a robot. One hundred and twenty German native speakers ( = 32 years, = 12 years) watched an online video featuring a NAO robot speaking either in the Berlin dialect or standard German and assessed its trustworthiness and competence. We found a positive relationship between participants' self-reported Berlin dialect proficiency and trustworthiness in the dialect-speaking robot. Only when controlled for demographic factors, there was a positive association between participants' dialect proficiency, dialect performance and their assessment of robot's competence for the standard German-speaking robot. Participants' age, gender, length of residency in Berlin, and device used to respond also influenced assessments. Finally, the robot's competence positively predicted its trustworthiness. Our results inform the design of social robots and emphasize the importance of device control in online experiments.

摘要

机器人越来越多地被用作与人类的互动伙伴。社交机器人被设计为在与人类互动时遵循预期的行为规范,并且有不同的声音甚至口音。一些研究表明,人们更喜欢机器人用用户的方言说话,而另一些研究则表明人们更喜欢不同的方言。我们的研究考察了柏林方言对机器人可信赖度和能力感知的影响。120名以德语为母语的德国人(平均年龄 = 32岁,标准差 = 12岁)观看了一段在线视频,视频中一个NAO机器人用柏林方言或标准德语说话,并对其可信赖度和能力进行了评估。我们发现,参与者自我报告的柏林方言熟练程度与说方言机器人的可信赖度之间存在正相关关系。只有在控制了人口统计学因素后,参与者的方言熟练程度、方言表现与他们对说标准德语机器人能力的评估之间才存在正相关。参与者的年龄、性别、在柏林的居住时间以及用于回应的设备也会影响评估结果。最后,机器人的能力对其可信赖度有正向预测作用。我们的研究结果为社交机器人的设计提供了参考,并强调了在线实验中设备控制的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cb/10859411/c63cfefaa887/frobt-10-1241519-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cb/10859411/81051ce645a7/frobt-10-1241519-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cb/10859411/a11256747609/frobt-10-1241519-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cb/10859411/8b4f932fc825/frobt-10-1241519-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cb/10859411/c63cfefaa887/frobt-10-1241519-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cb/10859411/81051ce645a7/frobt-10-1241519-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cb/10859411/a11256747609/frobt-10-1241519-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cb/10859411/8b4f932fc825/frobt-10-1241519-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cb/10859411/c63cfefaa887/frobt-10-1241519-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
"Ick bin een Berlina": dialect proficiency impacts a robot's trustworthiness and competence evaluation.“我是柏林人”:方言能力会影响对机器人的可信度和能力评估。 (注:原文中“Ick bin een Berlina”表述有误,正确的德语应该是“Ich bin ein Berliner” ,意思是“我是一个柏林人” )
Front Robot AI. 2024 Jan 29;10:1241519. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1241519. eCollection 2023.
2
Can Robots Earn Our Trust the Same Way Humans Do? A Systematic Exploration of Competence, Warmth, and Anthropomorphism as Determinants of Trust Development in HRI.机器人能像人类一样赢得我们的信任吗?对能力、温暖感和拟人化作为人机交互中信任发展决定因素的系统探索。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Apr 9;8:640444. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.640444. eCollection 2021.
3
Expectations vs. actual behavior of a social robot: An experimental investigation of the effects of a social robot's interaction skill level and its expected future role on people's evaluations.社交机器人的期望行为与实际行为:一项关于社交机器人的交互技能水平及其预期未来角色对人们评价影响的实验研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0238133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238133. eCollection 2020.
4
Semi-autonomous touch method merging robot's autonomous touch and user-operated touch for improving user experience in robot touch.半自主触摸方法,融合了机器人的自主触摸和用户操作触摸,以改善机器人触摸中的用户体验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 26;14(1):17667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67964-0.
5
When Trustworthiness Meets Face: Facial Design for Social Robots.当可信赖性遇见面部表情:社交机器人的面部设计。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;24(13):4215. doi: 10.3390/s24134215.
6
Freedom comes at a cost?: An exploratory study on affordances' impact on users' perception of a social robot.自由是有代价的?:关于可供性对用户对社交机器人认知影响的探索性研究
Front Robot AI. 2024 Mar 18;11:1288818. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1288818. eCollection 2024.
7
Trusting Autonomous Security Robots: The Role of Reliability and Stated Social Intent.信任自主安全机器人:可靠性和表述社会意图的作用。
Hum Factors. 2021 Jun;63(4):603-618. doi: 10.1177/0018720820901629. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
8
Which One? Choosing Favorite Robot After Different Styles of Storytelling and Robots' Conversation.哪一个?在不同的叙事风格和机器人对话之后选择最喜欢的机器人。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Sep 9;8:700005. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.700005. eCollection 2021.
9
A Study on the Effectiveness of IT Application Education for Older Adults by Interaction Method of Humanoid Robots.《基于仿人机器人交互方法的老年人信息技术应用教育效果研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10988. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710988.
10
The Human Takes It All: Humanlike Synthesized Voices Are Perceived as Less Eerie and More Likable. Evidence From a Subjective Ratings Study.人类主导一切:类人合成语音被认为不那么怪异且更讨人喜欢。来自一项主观评分研究的证据。
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Dec 16;14:593732. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.593732. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
What Makes a Robot Social? A Review of Social Robots from Science Fiction to a Home or Hospital Near You.是什么让机器人具有社交性?从科幻小说到你身边的家庭或医院的社交机器人综述。
Curr Robot Rep. 2021;2(1):9-19. doi: 10.1007/s43154-020-00035-0. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Can Robots Earn Our Trust the Same Way Humans Do? A Systematic Exploration of Competence, Warmth, and Anthropomorphism as Determinants of Trust Development in HRI.机器人能像人类一样赢得我们的信任吗?对能力、温暖感和拟人化作为人机交互中信任发展决定因素的系统探索。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Apr 9;8:640444. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.640444. eCollection 2021.
3
The Human Takes It All: Humanlike Synthesized Voices Are Perceived as Less Eerie and More Likable. Evidence From a Subjective Ratings Study.
人类主导一切:类人合成语音被认为不那么怪异且更讨人喜欢。来自一项主观评分研究的证据。
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Dec 16;14:593732. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.593732. eCollection 2020.
4
Social robots for education: A review.社交机器人在教育中的应用:综述。
Sci Robot. 2018 Aug 15;3(21). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954.
5
Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups.《社会世界的导航:评估自我、个体和群体的综合框架》
Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;128(2):290-314. doi: 10.1037/rev0000262. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
6
The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.黑羊效应:离经叛道的群体机器人案例。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 16;14(10):e0222975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222975. eCollection 2019.
7
Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder.潜伏在我们中间的大猩猩:一个在线行为实验构建器。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):388-407. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x.
8
Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study.识别特征,提高老年人对机器人的接受度:混合方法研究。
Gerontology. 2019;65(4):441-450. doi: 10.1159/000494881. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves.与机器人的互动:我们对自己的真实揭示。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:627-652. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.影响自动化信任发展因素的元分析:对理解未来系统自主性的启示
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):377-400. doi: 10.1177/0018720816634228. Epub 2016 Mar 22.