Brown Rebecca C H
Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Suite 8 Littlegate House, 16-17 St Ebbes Street, OX1 1PT, Oxford, UK.
Health Care Anal. 2019 Jun;27(2):61-76. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00366-w.
Many countries tightly ration access to publicly funded fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF). One basis for excluding people from access to IVF is their body mass index. In this paper, I consider a number of potential justifications for such a policy, based on claims about effectiveness and cost-efficiency, and reject these as unsupported by available evidence. I consider an alternative justification: that those whose subfertility results from avoidable behaviours for which they are responsible are less deserving of treatment. I ultimately stop short of endorsing or rejecting such a justification, though highlight some reasons for thinking it is unlikely to be practicable.
许多国家严格限制对诸如体外受精(IVF)等公共资助的生育治疗的获取。将人们排除在IVF治疗之外的一个依据是他们的体重指数。在本文中,我基于有关有效性和成本效益的主张,考虑了这一政策的一些潜在正当理由,并认为这些理由没有得到现有证据的支持而予以拒绝。我考虑了另一种正当理由:那些因自身应负责的可避免行为而导致生育力低下的人不太值得接受治疗。尽管我强调了一些认为这一理由不太可能可行的原因,但最终并未支持或拒绝这一理由。