Biomass Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Center, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Biomass Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Center, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Water Res. 2019 May 15;155:214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.048. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
The effect of bioaugmentation with different microorganisms on anaerobic digestion to mitigate the ammonia inhibition problem was investigated. Seven pure strains of microorganisms (including obligate aceticlastic methanogen, facultative aceticlastic methanogen, hydrogenotrophic methanogen, syntrophic acetate oxidizing bacteria (SAOB) were selected and thirteen bioaugmentation approaches were tested. Bioaugmentation with hydrogenotrophic methanogen Methanobrevibacter smithii (MBS) and SAOB Syntrophaceticu schinkii together was the optimal choice, methane production (MP) was 71.1% higher than that in Blank, the activity of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis was greatly heightened according to specific methanogenic activity analysis. Bioaugmentation with facultative aceticlastic methanogen Methanosarcina barkeri (MSB) alone without SAOB addition was also proven efficient (MP was 59.7% higher than that in Blank), both aceticlastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis were enhanced. Further evaluation with carbon isotope fractionations analysis indicated that balancing the activities of the aceticlastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenic pathways is of great importance. 16s rRNA gene sequencing results showed that Methanobacterium spp. and Methanosaeta spp. were the dominant archaea in all 14 reactors. Nevertheless, bioaugmentation with Methanosaeta spp. did not result in a positive effect on MP. On the other hand, Methanobrevibacter spp. and Methanosarcina spp. were non-dominant archaea (even after bioaugmentation with MBS or MSB, the relative abundances were still poor (<2%)), but displayed pivotal roles in determining the overall microbial consortium and, in turn, improved the overall performance.
研究了用不同微生物进行生物强化对厌氧消化的影响,以缓解氨抑制问题。选择了 7 株纯微生物(包括专性乙酸营养型产甲烷菌、兼性乙酸营养型产甲烷菌、氢营养型产甲烷菌、产乙酸菌),并测试了 13 种生物强化方法。与氢营养型产甲烷菌 Methanobrevibacter smithii(MBS)和产乙酸菌 Syntrophaceticu schinkii 一起进行生物强化是最佳选择,甲烷产量(MP)比空白组高 71.1%,根据特定产甲烷活性分析,氢营养型产甲烷活性大大提高。单独添加兼性乙酸营养型产甲烷菌 Methanosarcina barkeri(MSB)而不添加产乙酸菌也被证明是有效的(MP 比空白组高 59.7%),同时增强了乙酸营养型和氢营养型产甲烷作用。进一步通过碳同位素分馏分析评估表明,平衡乙酸营养型和氢营养型产甲烷途径的活性非常重要。16s rRNA 基因测序结果表明,所有 14 个反应器中的优势古菌均为 Methanobacterium spp. 和 Methanosaeta spp.。然而,添加 Methanosaeta spp. 对 MP 没有产生积极影响。另一方面,Methanobrevibacter spp. 和 Methanosarcina spp. 是非优势古菌(即使添加 MBS 或 MSB 后,相对丰度仍然很低(<2%)),但在确定整个微生物群落方面起着关键作用,进而提高了整体性能。