Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Granzer Regulatory Consulting & Services, Munich, Germany.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Sep;35(9):1495-1503. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1586401. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Among the numerous therapeutic approaches used in the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) few have been assessed with a sufficient level of evidence. The safety and efficacy of pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) has been shown in several open-label and comparative clinical trials with different populations including two meta-analyses. In the context of the approval procedure of PPS for the treatment of IC/BPS by the European Medicines Agency we updated the findings of the previous analyses by incorporating the results of the latest studies. Relevant studies based on a systematic review of PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library in June 2018 were identified. For completeness control, clinical trial registries were also searched. Only randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials providing sufficient information to estimate at least one relevant effect size measure to compare the efficacy of PPS versus placebo were included in the analysis. Of the studies identified in the literature search, six randomized placebo-controlled studies met the pre-defined eligibility criteria. Analyses showed no indication of heterogeneity or publication bias. Treatment with PPS led to a statistically significant improvement in the patient's overall response assessment ( < .001), pain ( = .009) and urgency ( = .005). Our meta-analyses confirmed the results of preceding meta-analyses showing that PPS is efficacious compared to placebo in the treatment of bladder pain, urinary urgency and frequency of micturition and thus an evident option for the treatment of IC/BPS symptoms.
在治疗间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征 (IC/BPS) 的众多治疗方法中,只有少数方法经过了充分的证据评估。戊聚糖多硫酸酯钠 (PPS) 的安全性和疗效已在包括两项荟萃分析在内的多项开放标签和对照临床试验中得到证实,这些试验涉及不同人群。在欧洲药品管理局 (EMA) 批准 PPS 治疗 IC/BPS 的程序中,我们通过纳入最新研究的结果更新了之前分析的结果。根据 2018 年 6 月对 PubMed/Medline 和 Cochrane 图书馆的系统评价,确定了相关研究。为了完整控制,还搜索了临床试验注册处。只有提供足够信息以估计至少一种相关效果量来比较 PPS 与安慰剂疗效的随机、安慰剂对照临床试验才被纳入分析。在文献检索中确定的研究中,有六项随机安慰剂对照研究符合预先定义的纳入标准。分析显示没有异质性或发表偏倚的迹象。与安慰剂相比,PPS 治疗可显著改善患者的整体反应评估( < .001)、疼痛( = .009)和急迫性( = .005)。我们的荟萃分析证实了之前荟萃分析的结果,即与安慰剂相比,PPS 在治疗膀胱疼痛、尿急和尿频方面具有疗效,因此是治疗 IC/BPS 症状的一种明显选择。