Schrepf Andrew, Locke Kenneth, Moldwin Robert, Williams David A, Till Sara, Farrar John, Richard Landis J, Tu Frank, Rodriguez Larissa, Lai Henry, Naliboff Bruce, Kutch Jason, Harte Steven E, Harris Richard E, Kreder Karl J, Spitznagle Tracy, McKernan Lindsey, Yang Claire, Quentin Clemens J, Mullins Chris, Clauw Daniel J
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Aug;44(6):1290-1295. doi: 10.1002/nau.70068. Epub 2025 May 25.
Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (UCPPS) impacts millions of people in the United States but treatment options remain largely unsatisfying. A large number of neurobiological studies from the Multidisciplinary Approach to the study of chronic Pelvic Pain (MAPP) research network and others point to aberrant pain mechanisms in patients with UCPPS and widespread pain, but the clinical significance of widespread pain has been speculative.
In the current exploratory study we investigated whether pain and urologic symptoms responded to centrally-directed therapies (tricyclic antidepressants/gabapentinoids) versus peripherally-directed (pelvic floor physical therapy/hydrodistension) therapies depending on the presence or absence of widespread pain when the new treatment was initiated.
Forty UCPPS patients (n = 19 widespread) underwent an evaluation of UCPPS symptoms before and after twelve weeks of either centrally-directed (n = 16) or peripherally-directed therapy. Participants were stratified post hoc into widespread (two or more non-pelvic pain sites + pelvic pain) and localized pain categories. General linear models were used to test the group X treatment interaction effect, adjusting for age, sex, and baseline outcome levels. On average, patients with widespread pain receiving centrally-directed therapies improved more than six points on the 0-28 Pelvic Pain Severity scale, while those with localized pain showed no average improvement (interaction p = 0.005). Similar effects were observed for the bladder symptom impact score (interaction p = 0.011) but not urologic symptom severity (interaction p = 0.72). While these findings are exploratory, they provide preliminary evidence for phenotype X treatment interactions in UCPPS and should be followed by confirmatory studies.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02514265-MAPP Research Network: Trans-MAPP Study of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain: Symptom Patterns Study (SPS).
gov Identifier: NCT02898220-Trans-MAPP Study of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain: Control Study Protocol.xs.
美国数百万民众受泌尿生殖系统慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(UCPPS)影响,但治疗方案大多不尽人意。多学科慢性盆腔疼痛研究(MAPP)网络及其他机构开展的大量神经生物学研究表明,UCPPS患者存在异常疼痛机制且疼痛广泛,但广泛性疼痛的临床意义一直存在推测性。
在当前这项探索性研究中,我们调查了在开始新治疗时,根据是否存在广泛性疼痛,疼痛及泌尿系统症状对中枢导向疗法(三环类抗抑郁药/加巴喷丁类药物)与外周导向疗法(盆底物理治疗/膀胱水扩张)的反应情况。
40例UCPPS患者(n = 19例广泛性疼痛患者)在接受为期12周的中枢导向疗法(n = 16)或外周导向疗法前后,接受了UCPPS症状评估。参与者事后被分层为广泛性疼痛(两个或更多非盆腔疼痛部位 + 盆腔疼痛)和局限性疼痛类别。使用一般线性模型来检验组×治疗交互效应,并对年龄、性别和基线结局水平进行调整。平均而言,接受中枢导向疗法的广泛性疼痛患者在0 - 28分盆腔疼痛严重程度量表上改善超过6分,而局限性疼痛患者平均无改善(交互作用p = 0.005)。膀胱症状影响评分也观察到类似效果(交互作用p = 0.011),但泌尿系统症状严重程度未观察到(交互作用p = 0.72)。虽然这些发现具有探索性,但它们为UCPPS中表型×治疗交互作用提供了初步证据,后续应开展验证性研究。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02514265 - MAPP研究网络:泌尿生殖系统慢性盆腔疼痛的跨MAPP研究:症状模式研究(SPS)。
gov标识符:NCT02898220 - 泌尿生殖系统慢性盆腔疼痛的跨MAPP研究:对照研究方案.xs。