Suppr超能文献

戊聚糖多硫酸酯治疗伴有Hunner溃疡或肾小球样改变的膀胱疼痛综合征/间质性膀胱炎患者:系统评价与荟萃分析

Pentosan polysulfate in patients with bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis with Hunner's lesions or glomerulations: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Grigoryan Bagrat, Kasyan George, Pivazyan Laura, Pushkar Dmitry

机构信息

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya str. 8/2, Moscow 119048, Russian Federation.

Urology Department, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russian Federation.

出版信息

Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Jun 2;14:17562872221102809. doi: 10.1177/17562872221102809. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is a persistent pain perceived in the urinary bladder region, accompanied by at least one symptom, such as pain worsening with bladder filling and daytime or nighttime urinary frequency without any proven infection or obvious pathology. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pentosan polysulfate (PPS) in patients with BPS/IC.

METHODS

Systematic search was performed by PRISMA checklist. Electronic databases, including PubMed and Cochrane library, were checked until 2021 using keywords: 'pentosan polysulfate', 'pain syndrome', 'interstitial cystitis', and bibliography of relevant papers was checked.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients with confirmed diagnosis of BPS/IC and cystoscopy criteria - Hunner's lesions. Exclusion criteria included hypersensitivity, pregnancy, lactation, and oral therapy for BPS/IC in the period of 1 month before the study and abstracts or unpublished papers.

RESULTS

In total, 13 clinical trials were included in systematic review and 7 were included in meta-analysis. Studies evaluated the effectiveness and safety of oral PPS placebo or other treatment options. In the first meta-analysis, three studies compared oral PPS with placebo: [relative risk (RR) = 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-3.13,  = 0.0006]. The second meta-analysis of two studies compared oral PPS with another treatment options (intravesical liposome and CyA): (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.10-1.93,  = 0.28). The third meta-analysis of two studies included intravesical regimen of PPS compared with intravesical placebo: (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.54-2.22,  = 0.80). The majority of studies do not report any particular serious side effects.

CONCLUSION

PPS treatment has a statistically significant effect over placebo on the subjective improvement of patients with BPS/IC. There was no difference between PPS and other treatment options. Intravesical regimen of PPS had no significant impact on response rates. None of included studies reported severe side effects after intervention.

摘要

背景

膀胱疼痛综合征/间质性膀胱炎(BPS/IC)是一种在膀胱区域感觉到的持续性疼痛,伴有至少一种症状,如膀胱充盈时疼痛加剧以及白天或夜间尿频,且无任何已证实的感染或明显病理改变。本研究的目的是评估聚多卡醇(PPS)治疗BPS/IC患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

按照PRISMA清单进行系统检索。使用关键词“聚多卡醇”“疼痛综合征”“间质性膀胱炎”检索包括PubMed和Cochrane图书馆在内的电子数据库至2021年,并查阅相关论文的参考文献。

纳入标准

确诊为BPS/IC且符合膀胱镜检查标准——Hunner溃疡的患者。排除标准包括过敏、妊娠、哺乳期以及研究前1个月内接受过BPS/IC口服治疗的患者,以及摘要或未发表的论文。

结果

系统评价共纳入13项临床试验,荟萃分析纳入7项。这些研究评估了口服PPS、安慰剂或其他治疗方案的有效性和安全性。在首次荟萃分析中,三项研究比较了口服PPS与安慰剂:[相对危险度(RR)=2.07,95%置信区间(CI):1.37 - 3.13,P = 0.0006]。第二项对两项研究的荟萃分析比较了口服PPS与另一种治疗方案(膀胱内脂质体和环孢素A):(RR = 0.44,95% CI:0.10 - 1.93,P = 0.28)。第三项对两项研究的荟萃分析纳入了膀胱内使用PPS方案与膀胱内使用安慰剂的比较:(RR = 1.09,95% CI:0.54 - 2.22,P = 0.80)。大多数研究未报告任何特别严重的副作用。

结论

PPS治疗对BPS/IC患者的主观改善效果在统计学上显著优于安慰剂。PPS与其他治疗方案之间无差异。膀胱内使用PPS方案对缓解率无显著影响。纳入的研究均未报告干预后出现严重副作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1418/9168945/f13f5294f1dc/10.1177_17562872221102809-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验