Fortenberry Katherine T, Cochella Susan, Stoesser Kirsten, Ose Dominik, Taylor Eliza, Frame Kara A, Van Hala Sonja
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
PRiMER. 2022 Sep 21;6:321624. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2022.321624. eCollection 2022.
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education allows flexibility for resident roles in the Milestone assessment process. The University of Utah Family Medicine Residency implemented a resident-led Milestones process to cultivate the skill of self-assessment and promote resident ownership of their learning.
Residents were provided comprehensive evaluation data and asked to self-assess their competency on each Milestone, with input from their advisor. Residents presented their self-assessment to the Clinical Competency Committee, who then determined the final score for each Milestone. A 10-question survey examined perceptions of the resident-led Milestones process by residents and faculty. We calculated means and standard deviations (SD).
A total of 16 of 24 residents (67% response rate) and 12 of 14 faculty (86% response rate) completed the survey. Residents agreed most highly with the following statements: "I have good support from my advisor in being prepared to lead my Milestones meeting," "I am actively engaged in guiding the development of my own Milestones ratings," and "Leading my Milestones meeting assists me in accurately self-assessing my progress." Residents showed high agreement that "My final Milestones scores accurately reflect my behavior and level of knowledge." Residents rated the stress as low, in response to the statement, "My Milestones meeting is stressful for me." Faculty responses were similar but tended toward lower scores than residents.
The resident-led Milestones process engages residents actively in self-assessment. Residents and faculty believe the process provides accurate assessment results without undue stress; this process potentially increases residents' ability to understand their own learning needs and direct their own learning process.
毕业后医学教育认证委员会在住院医师能力评估过程中允许对住院医师角色有一定灵活性。犹他大学家庭医学住院医师培训项目实施了由住院医师主导的能力评估流程,以培养自我评估技能并促进住院医师对自身学习的自主掌控。
为住院医师提供全面的评估数据,并要求他们在导师的指导下对每个能力评估指标进行自我评估。住院医师向临床能力委员会汇报他们的自我评估,然后由委员会确定每个能力评估指标的最终得分。通过一项包含10个问题的调查,了解住院医师和教员对由住院医师主导的能力评估流程的看法。我们计算了平均值和标准差(SD)。
24名住院医师中有16名(67%的回复率)以及14名教员中有12名(86%的回复率)完成了调查。住院医师对以下陈述的认同度最高:“在准备主持我的能力评估会议方面,我得到了导师的有力支持”、“我积极参与指导自己能力评估评级的制定”以及“主持我的能力评估会议有助于我准确地自我评估自己的进展”。住院医师高度认同“我的最终能力评估得分准确反映了我的行为和知识水平”。对于“我的能力评估会议让我感到压力很大”这一陈述,住院医师将压力评为较低。教员的回复与之相似,但得分往往低于住院医师。
由住院医师主导的能力评估流程让住院医师积极参与自我评估。住院医师和教员认为该流程能提供准确的评估结果且不会造成过大压力;此流程有可能增强住院医师理解自身学习需求并指导自身学习过程的能力。