Columbia University School of Nursing, 630 West 168th Street, Box 6, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Jun;50(6):2102-2127. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03967-5.
We conducted a 5-year follow-up systematic review and meta-analysis to determine change in frequency of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis since diagnostic and statistical manual 5 (DSM-5) publication and explore the impact of Social Communication Disorder (SCD). For 33 included studies, use of DSM-5 criteria suggests decreases in diagnosis for ASD [20.8% (16.0-26.7), p < 0.001], DSM-IV-TR Autistic Disorder [10.1% (6.2-16.0), p < 0.001], and Asperger's [23.3% (12.9-38.5), p = 0.001]; pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified decrease was not significant [46.1% (34.6-58.0), p = 0.52]. Less than one-third [28.8% (13.9-50.5), p = 0.06] of individuals diagnosed with DSM-IV-TR but not DSM-5 ASD would qualify for SCD. Findings suggest smaller decreases in ASD diagnoses compared to earlier reviews. Future research is needed as concerns remain for impaired individuals without a diagnosis.
我们进行了一项为期 5 年的随访系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第 5 版(DSM-5)出版以来,自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)诊断的频率变化,并探讨社交沟通障碍(SCD)的影响。对于纳入的 33 项研究,使用 DSM-5 标准表明 ASD 的诊断率下降[20.8%(16.0-26.7),p<0.001],DSM-IV-TR 自闭症障碍下降[10.1%(6.2-16.0),p<0.001],和阿斯伯格症下降[23.3%(12.9-38.5),p=0.001];未特定的广泛性发育障碍的下降没有显著差异[46.1%(34.6-58.0),p=0.52]。不到三分之一[28.8%(13.9-50.5),p=0.06]被诊断为 DSM-IV-TR 但不符合 DSM-5 ASD 的个体符合 SCD 的标准。与早期综述相比,这些发现表明 ASD 诊断的减少幅度较小。由于对没有诊断的受损个体仍然存在担忧,因此需要进行未来的研究。