• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成年人因心力衰竭住院时健康素养测量的同时效度和可接受性。

Concurrent validity and acceptability of health literacy measures of adults hospitalized with heart failure.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Graduate Department, Rhode Island College, Providence, RI, United States of America.

Adult Nursing Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

Appl Nurs Res. 2019 Apr;46:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2019.02.007
PMID:30853076
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test concurrent validity and acceptability of the Single Item Literacy Screener (SILS), Test of Functional Health Literacy (S-TOFHLA) and the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) in hospitalized adults with heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND

Health literacy is not routinely evaluated in adults hospitalized with HF. Low health literacy is linked to poor HF self-care and hospital readmissions.

METHODS

SILS, NVS and S-TOFHLA were completed by 85 patients with HF. Measures were examined for internal consistency reliability and acceptability. The NVS and S-TOFHLA were correlated with the SILS to establish concurrent validity.

RESULTS

The NVS (α = 0.70) and S-TOFHLA (α = 0.88) were reliable. The SILS significantly correlated with the S-TOFHLA (r = -0.308). The S-TOFHLA (M = 6.16) and NVS (M = 6.10) were acceptable measures.

CONCLUSION

The S-TOFHLA and NVS were reliable and acceptable measures of health literacy in hospitalized HF population. The SILS correlated with the S-TOFHLA and may predict low health literacy when hospitalized. NVS total scores in this population aligned with the recent NAAL survey. Hospitalized adults with HF agreed to share the health literacy scores with their providers.

摘要

目的

测试住院心力衰竭(HF)成人中单项目文化程度筛查器(SILS)、功能性健康文化程度测试(S-TOFHLA)和最新生命体征(NVS)的同时效度和可接受性。

背景

HF 住院成人中未常规评估健康文化程度。低健康文化程度与 HF 自我护理不良和医院再入院相关。

方法

85 例 HF 患者完成 SILS、NVS 和 S-TOFHLA。评估措施的内部一致性可靠性和可接受性。NVS 和 S-TOFHLA 与 SILS 相关,以建立同时效度。

结果

NVS(α=0.70)和 S-TOFHLA(α=0.88)可靠。SILS 与 S-TOFHLA 显著相关(r=-0.308)。S-TOFHLA(M=6.16)和 NVS(M=6.10)是可接受的措施。

结论

S-TOFHLA 和 NVS 是 HF 住院人群健康文化程度可靠和可接受的测量方法。SILS 与 S-TOFHLA 相关,可能预测住院时的低健康文化程度。该人群的 NVS 总分数与最近的 NAAL 调查一致。HF 住院成人同意与提供者分享健康文化程度评分。

相似文献

1
Concurrent validity and acceptability of health literacy measures of adults hospitalized with heart failure.成年人因心力衰竭住院时健康素养测量的同时效度和可接受性。
Appl Nurs Res. 2019 Apr;46:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
Evaluation of instruments to assess health literacy in Arabic language among Iraqis.伊拉克人中评估阿拉伯语健康素养的工具评价
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):803-13. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
3
Single-item or two-item literacy screener to predict the S-TOFHLA among adult hemodialysis patients.用于预测成年血液透析患者S-TOFHLA的单项或两项读写能力筛查工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan;94(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.020. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
4
Comparing the Performance of the S-TOFHLA and NVS Among and Between English and Spanish Speakers.比较英语和西班牙语使用者中S-TOFHLA和NVS的表现。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(12):1458-64. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018629. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
5
Performance of health literacy tests among older adults with diabetes.老年糖尿病患者健康素养测试的表现。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):534-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1927-y. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
6
Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of brief health literacy and numeracy screening instruments in an urban emergency department.城市急诊科简易健康素养和算数筛查工具的可行性和诊断准确性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(2):137-46. doi: 10.1111/acem.12315.
7
Is the Newest Vital Sign a Useful Measure of Health Literacy in HIV Disease?最新的生命体征是否是衡量HIV疾病健康素养的有用指标?
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2017 Nov/Dec;16(6):595-602. doi: 10.1177/2325957417729753. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
Assessment of Health Literacy and validation of single-item literacy screener (SILS) in a sample of Italian people.意大利人群样本中健康素养评估及单项素养筛查工具(SILS)的验证
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2017 Jul-Sep;53(3):205-212. doi: 10.4415/ANN_17_03_05.
9
Measuring health literacy in caregivers of children: a comparison of the newest vital sign and S-TOFHLA.测量儿童照料者的健康素养:最新生命体征与S-TOFHLA的比较。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014 Nov;53(13):1264-70. doi: 10.1177/0009922814541674. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
10
Validation of a Short Form for Health Literacy Assessment Using Talking Touchscreen Technology.使用触屏语音技术验证健康素养评估的简短形式。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 Oct 8;4(4):e200-e207. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20200909-01.

引用本文的文献

1
Mediating effect of dietary self-efficacy in the relationship between health literacy and nutrition label use among coronary heart disease patients.饮食自我效能在冠心病患者健康素养与营养标签使用关系中的中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7342. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92386-x.
2
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Corticosteroids Use Among Patients With Chronic Rheumatology Condition: A Cross-Sectional Study From Vietnam.越南慢性风湿病患者使用非甾体抗炎药和皮质类固醇的知识、态度及实践:一项横断面研究
Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 23;17:11795441241308876. doi: 10.1177/11795441241308876. eCollection 2024.
3
Application of the PAPERS Grading Criteria Within a Rapid Evidence Review to Determine the Psychometric and Pragmatic Properties of Patient Empowerment Tools.
在快速证据审查中应用PAPERS分级标准以确定患者赋权工具的心理测量和实用特性。
J Patient Exp. 2024 Aug 21;11:23743735241272191. doi: 10.1177/23743735241272191. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessment Tools for Measuring Health Literacy and Digital Health Literacy in a Hospital Setting: A Scoping Review.医院环境中测量健康素养和数字健康素养的评估工具:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 20;12(1):11. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010011.
5
Heart Disease Knowledge and Awareness in African American and Hispanic Women.非裔美国女性和西班牙裔女性的心脏病知识和意识。
South Med J. 2023 Oct;116(10):783-789. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001610.
6
Documenting limited health literacy in a clinical setting.记录临床环境中有限的健康素养。
PEC Innov. 2022 May 21;1:100052. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100052. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Health Literacy, Social Networks, and Health Outcomes among Mental Health Clubhouse Members in Hawai'i.夏威夷心理健康会所会员的健康素养、社交网络和健康结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 2;20(1):837. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010837.
8
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
9
Definitions and measurement of health literacy in health and medicine research: a systematic review.健康和医学研究中健康素养的定义和测量:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):e056294. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056294.