Suppr超能文献

[环境风险与健康素养:一项系统综述]

[Environmental risks and health literacy: a systematic review].

作者信息

Pfleger Elisabeth, Lutz Regina, Drexler Hans

机构信息

Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits‑, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestraße 9-11, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.

FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Essen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Jan;67(1):85-98. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03782-5. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Environmental factors can play an important role in pathogenesis. However, the understanding of the relationship between environmental risks and health in the general population appears to be poor. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the state of research on the relationship between health literacy (HL) or environmental health literacy (EHL) and environmental risks differentiated by the researched environmental risks, the affected population, the measurement and level of HL or EHL, and their interaction with other variables.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using the Pubmed, Scopus, and LIVIVO databases. Original studies in German or English that investigated HL or EHL in the context of an environmental risk or pollutant in a population were included. The Navigation Guide was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The operationalization of HL or EHL was heterogeneous in 22 studies. Nine studies referred to environmental issues in general, and 15 studies analyzed individual environmental risks. Eleven studies referred to the general population, 12 to specified target groups, and 1 study examined both. The level of HL or EHL proved to be in need of improvement in all populations. Interventions such as trainings were able to increase HL or EHL.

DISCUSSION

The heterogeneous operationalizations impede the comparability of the studies. Future work should target the standardization of methodological aspects. Overall, it appears that interventions such as trainings were conducive to improving HL or EHL. In practice, this should therefore be given greater focus in order to increase HL or EHL.

摘要

背景

环境因素在发病机制中可能起重要作用。然而,普通人群对环境风险与健康之间关系的理解似乎不足。本系统评价的目的是描述关于健康素养(HL)或环境健康素养(EHL)与环境风险之间关系的研究现状,这些关系根据所研究的环境风险、受影响人群、HL或EHL的测量方法和水平,以及它们与其他变量的相互作用来区分。

方法

使用PubMed、Scopus和LIVIVO数据库进行系统文献检索。纳入以德语或英语发表的、在人群中研究环境风险或污染物背景下的HL或EHL的原始研究。采用导航指南评估研究的方法学质量。

结果

24项研究纳入定性分析。22项研究中HL或EHL的操作化存在异质性。9项研究总体提及环境问题,15项研究分析个体环境风险。11项研究涉及普通人群,12项研究涉及特定目标群体,1项研究两者都有涉及。所有人群的HL或EHL水平都有待提高。培训等干预措施能够提高HL或EHL。

讨论

操作化的异质性妨碍了研究的可比性。未来的工作应致力于方法学方面的标准化。总体而言,培训等干预措施似乎有利于提高HL或EHL。因此,在实践中应更加关注这一点,以提高HL或EHL。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0531/10776732/bdf4db029530/103_2023_3782_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验