Badgett Robert, Chen Jiatian, May Douglas R, Field Tom, Greiner K Allen
University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Internal Medicine.
University of Kansas School of Business, Lawrence, KS.
Kans J Med. 2019 Feb 26;12(1):4-6. eCollection 2019 Feb.
Experts suggest health care institutions switch focus from measuring burnout to measuring positive organizational psychology. Concerns include burnout being a late sign of organizational decline. The Baldrige survey is promoted by the U.S. Department of Commerce to measure positive worksite conditions (e.g., workforce wellbeing of industries, including health care and education). For years, the survey has been completed by managers within organizations, but now the same survey is promoted for completion by an organization's workforce. We tested the structure of the Baldrige survey when completed by an academic health care workforce. In addition, we tested whether the results in an academic worksite correlate with an example metric of an organizational mission.
In 2015, our academic health center surveyed faculty and staff with the Baldrige survey. The validity of the Baldrige was tested with confirmatory factor analyses. Within the School of Medicine, responses for the Baldrige's concepts were correlated against a measure of organizational outcome: graduates' assessments of Departmental educational quality.
The structure of the Baldrige survey did not validate when assessed by a workforce (RMSEA = 0.086; CFI = 0.829; TLI = 0.815). None of its concepts correlated with learner reported educational quality.
The Baldrige survey, when administered to a workforce rather than managers, did not appear to measure workforce well-being within an academic health care center. We discourage use of the current survey for this purpose.
专家建议医疗保健机构将重点从衡量职业倦怠转向衡量积极组织心理学。相关担忧包括职业倦怠是组织衰退的晚期迹象。美国商务部推广波多里奇调查以衡量积极的工作场所条件(例如,包括医疗保健和教育在内的各行业劳动力福祉)。多年来,该调查一直由组织内的管理人员完成,但现在同样的调查也推广给组织的员工来完成。我们测试了由学术医疗保健人员完成的波多里奇调查的结构。此外,我们还测试了学术工作场所的结果是否与组织使命的一个示例指标相关。
2015年,我们的学术健康中心用波多里奇调查对教职员工进行了调查。通过验证性因素分析测试了波多里奇调查的有效性。在医学院内,将波多里奇调查概念的回答与一项组织成果指标相关联:毕业生对部门教育质量的评估。
当由员工进行评估时,波多里奇调查的结构未得到验证(RMSEA = 0.086;CFI = 0.829;TLI = 0.815)。其任何概念都与学习者报告的教育质量无关。
当由员工而非管理人员进行管理时,波多里奇调查似乎无法衡量学术医疗保健中心内员工的福祉。我们不建议为此目的使用当前的调查。