• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center?联邦波多里奇调查能否衡量学术医疗中心的员工福祉?
Kans J Med. 2019 Feb 26;12(1):4-6. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
Understanding High-Reliability Organizations: Are Baldrige Recipients Models?理解高可靠性组织:波多里奇奖获得者是典范吗?
J Healthc Manag. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):44-61.
3
Help Us Help You: Engaging Emergency Physicians to Identify Organizational Strategies to Reduce Burnout.帮助我们帮助您:促使急诊医生确定减少职业倦怠的组织策略。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr 8;22(3):696-701. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.49180.
4
A survey-based benchmarking approach for health care using the Baldrige quality criteria.一种使用鲍德里奇质量标准的基于调查的医疗保健标杆管理方法。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Sep;20(9):500-9. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30096-7.
5
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
6
The quest for TQM in a community mental health center: using the Baldrige criteria as a framework.社区心理健康中心对全面质量管理的追求:以波多里奇标准为框架
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996 Jan;22(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30207-3.
7
An Extended Validity Argument for Assessing Feedback Culture.评估反馈文化的扩展效度论证
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):355-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077133.
8
Using baldrige performance excellence program approaches in the pursuit of radiation oncology quality care, patient satisfaction, and workforce commitment.运用 Baldrige 卓越绩效模式方法,追求肿瘤放射治疗质量关怀、患者满意度和员工敬业度。
Front Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;1:9. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2011.00009. eCollection 2011.
9
Organizational and leadership perceptions assessment: opportunities and challenges using the Baldrige companion surveys.组织与领导力认知评估:使用波多里奇配套调查问卷的机遇与挑战
J Healthc Qual. 2011 Jan-Feb;33(1):14-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00088.x.
10
Monitoring stress levels in postgraduate medical training.监测研究生医学培训中的压力水平。
Laryngoscope. 2009 Jan;119(1):75-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.20013.

本文引用的文献

1
Restoring Faculty Vitality in Academic Medicine When Burnout Threatens.当职业倦怠威胁到学术医学中的教师活力时,如何恢复。
Acad Med. 2018 Jul;93(7):979-984. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002013.
2
The Problems With Burnout Research. burnout 研究中的问题。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):367-370. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001890.
3
The Relationship Between Professional Burnout and Quality and Safety in Healthcare: A Meta-Analysis.职业倦怠与医疗保健质量及安全之间的关系:一项荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):475-482. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3886-9. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
4
Do Work Condition Interventions Affect Quality and Errors in Primary Care? Results from the Healthy Work Place Study.工作条件干预措施是否会影响初级保健的质量和差错?来自健康工作场所研究的结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):56-61. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3856-2. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
5
Changes in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work-Life Balance in Physicians and the General US Working Population Between 2011 and 2014.2011 年至 2014 年期间,医生和美国普通劳动人口的倦怠和工作-生活平衡满意度变化。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Dec;90(12):1600-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.023.
6
Challenges for internal medicine as the American College of Physicians celebrates its 100th anniversary.美国内科医师学会庆祝成立100周年之际内科面临的挑战。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 21;162(8):585-6. doi: 10.7326/M14-2905.
7
From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.从三重目标到四重目标:照顾患者需要照顾医疗服务提供者。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713.
8
Working conditions in primary care: physician reactions and care quality.基层医疗的工作条件:医生的反应与医疗质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 7;151(1):28-36, W6-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-1-200907070-00006.
9
Empirical support for the Baldrige Award framework in U.S. hospitals.美国医院对波多里奇奖框架的实证支持。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2002 Winter;27(1):62-75. doi: 10.1097/00004010-200201000-00006.

联邦波多里奇调查能否衡量学术医疗中心的员工福祉?

Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center?

作者信息

Badgett Robert, Chen Jiatian, May Douglas R, Field Tom, Greiner K Allen

机构信息

University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Internal Medicine.

University of Kansas School of Business, Lawrence, KS.

出版信息

Kans J Med. 2019 Feb 26;12(1):4-6. eCollection 2019 Feb.

PMID:30854161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6396958/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Experts suggest health care institutions switch focus from measuring burnout to measuring positive organizational psychology. Concerns include burnout being a late sign of organizational decline. The Baldrige survey is promoted by the U.S. Department of Commerce to measure positive worksite conditions (e.g., workforce wellbeing of industries, including health care and education). For years, the survey has been completed by managers within organizations, but now the same survey is promoted for completion by an organization's workforce. We tested the structure of the Baldrige survey when completed by an academic health care workforce. In addition, we tested whether the results in an academic worksite correlate with an example metric of an organizational mission.

METHODS

In 2015, our academic health center surveyed faculty and staff with the Baldrige survey. The validity of the Baldrige was tested with confirmatory factor analyses. Within the School of Medicine, responses for the Baldrige's concepts were correlated against a measure of organizational outcome: graduates' assessments of Departmental educational quality.

RESULTS

The structure of the Baldrige survey did not validate when assessed by a workforce (RMSEA = 0.086; CFI = 0.829; TLI = 0.815). None of its concepts correlated with learner reported educational quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The Baldrige survey, when administered to a workforce rather than managers, did not appear to measure workforce well-being within an academic health care center. We discourage use of the current survey for this purpose.

摘要

引言

专家建议医疗保健机构将重点从衡量职业倦怠转向衡量积极组织心理学。相关担忧包括职业倦怠是组织衰退的晚期迹象。美国商务部推广波多里奇调查以衡量积极的工作场所条件(例如,包括医疗保健和教育在内的各行业劳动力福祉)。多年来,该调查一直由组织内的管理人员完成,但现在同样的调查也推广给组织的员工来完成。我们测试了由学术医疗保健人员完成的波多里奇调查的结构。此外,我们还测试了学术工作场所的结果是否与组织使命的一个示例指标相关。

方法

2015年,我们的学术健康中心用波多里奇调查对教职员工进行了调查。通过验证性因素分析测试了波多里奇调查的有效性。在医学院内,将波多里奇调查概念的回答与一项组织成果指标相关联:毕业生对部门教育质量的评估。

结果

当由员工进行评估时,波多里奇调查的结构未得到验证(RMSEA = 0.086;CFI = 0.829;TLI = 0.815)。其任何概念都与学习者报告的教育质量无关。

结论

当由员工而非管理人员进行管理时,波多里奇调查似乎无法衡量学术医疗保健中心内员工的福祉。我们不建议为此目的使用当前的调查。