Suppr超能文献

医源性食管穿孔后的结局

Outcome after iatrogenic esophageal perforation.

作者信息

Hauge Tobias, Kleven Ole Christian, Johnson Egil, Hofstad Bjørn, Johannessen Hans-Olaf

机构信息

a Department of Surgery , Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken HF , Drammen , Norway.

b Department of Surgery , Lillehammer Hospital, Sykehuset Innlandet , Lillehammer , Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;54(2):140-144. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1575464. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Iatrogenic perforations are the most common cause of esophageal perforation. We present our experience mainly based on a non-operative treatment approach as well as long-term outcome in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients were treated for iatrogenic esophageal perforation at Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål from February 2007 to March 2014. The etiology of perforation was dilation of benign stricture in eight patients, either dilation, stenting or stent removal in four with malignant stenosis, during diagnostic endoscopy in four, removal of foreign body in two and by other causes in three patients, respectively. After median 82 months, 10 patients alive (47.6%) were sent questionnaires about dysphagia, HRQoL and fatigue.

RESULTS

Median age at time of treatment was 66 years. Median in-hospital stay and mortality were 10.5 days and 4.8%, respectively. Initial treatment in 15 patients (71.4%) was non-surgical of whom one needed delayed debridement for pleural empyema. Initial treatment in six patients (28.6%) was surgical of whom three needed delayed stenting. Altogether 14 patients (66.7%) were stented. Eight (57.1%) had restenting. Median number of stents used was 1 (1-4). The stents were removed after median 36 days. The perforations healed after 2.5 months. After median 82 months, the patients reported reduced HRQoL. There was no significant difference regarding level of dysphagia and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

We report satisfactorily short-term and long-term results of iatrogenic esophageal perforations. Mortality was low and HRQoL was deteriorated. Dysphagia and fatigue were comparable to a reference population.

摘要

目的

医源性穿孔是食管穿孔最常见的原因。我们主要介绍基于非手术治疗方法以及这些患者长期预后的经验。

材料与方法

2007年2月至2014年3月期间,奥斯陆大学医院乌勒瓦尔分院对21例医源性食管穿孔患者进行了治疗。穿孔病因分别为:8例良性狭窄扩张,4例恶性狭窄患者行扩张、支架置入或支架取出术,4例诊断性内镜检查时发生穿孔,2例异物取出术,3例为其他原因。中位随访82个月后,向10例存活患者(47.6%)发送了关于吞咽困难、健康相关生活质量和疲劳的问卷。

结果

治疗时的中位年龄为66岁。中位住院时间和死亡率分别为10.5天和4.8%。15例患者(71.4%)初始治疗为非手术治疗,其中1例因胸腔积脓需要延迟清创。6例患者(28.6%)初始治疗为手术治疗,其中3例需要延迟置入支架。共有14例患者(66.7%)置入了支架。8例(57.1%)进行了再次置入支架。使用支架的中位数量为1(1 - 4)个。支架在中位36天后取出。穿孔在2.5个月后愈合。中位随访82个月后,患者报告健康相关生活质量下降。吞咽困难程度和疲劳程度无显著差异。

结论

我们报告了医源性食管穿孔令人满意的短期和长期结果。死亡率低,健康相关生活质量下降。吞咽困难和疲劳程度与参考人群相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验