Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Sinop Ayancik State Hospital, Sinop, Turkey.
Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1267-1272.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
Long-term favorable clinical outcomes of anatomical or high hip center techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, there is little information about the effect of the hip center location on gait characteristics. The purpose of this study was to compare these surgical techniques with gait analysis, analyze the effect of the hip rotation center location on gait parameters, and discuss the possible problems that may arise.
A total of 40 patients who underwent THA due to unilateral coxarthrosis secondary to Crowe type III-IV DDH and completed 5 years of follow-up were included in the study. Group 1 included 20 patients who underwent anatomical hip center reconstruction, while group 2 included 20 patients who underwent high hip center reconstruction. Gait analysis was performed, and the groups were compared according to the gait characteristics.
The mean temporospatial values were similar between the groups. The extension of the operated side was significantly lower in group 2 (-9.11 ± 8.92) than in group 1 (-1.87 ± 11.51) (P = .04). The mean longitudinal hip joint force was found to be significantly higher in group 2 (8.92 N/kg ± 0.54) than in group 1 (8.16 N/kg ± 0.66) (P = .04). The high hip center technique has been shown to increase the load on the hip and restrict the dynamic range of motion.
The high hip center technique can decrease the survival of the implant and increase the fall risk as it increases the load on the hip and reduces the dynamic range of motion. The hip center should be reconstructed anatomically when possible in DDH patients who undergo unilateral THA.
在髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者中,全髋关节置换术(THA)的解剖或高髋关节中心技术可获得长期良好的临床效果。然而,关于髋关节中心位置对步态特征的影响的信息很少。本研究的目的是通过步态分析比较这些手术技术,分析髋关节旋转中心位置对步态参数的影响,并讨论可能出现的问题。
共纳入 40 例因 Crowe Ⅲ-Ⅳ型髋关节发育不良继发单侧髋关节骨关节炎行 THA 且完成 5 年随访的患者,其中 20 例行解剖学髋关节中心重建(A 组),20 例行高髋关节中心重建(H 组)。行步态分析,并根据步态特征进行组间比较。
两组间时空间值的均值相似。H 组患侧髋关节伸展度明显低于 A 组(-9.11 ± 8.92)比(-1.87 ± 11.51)(P =.04)。H 组的髋关节纵向合力均值明显高于 A 组(8.92 N/kg ± 0.54)比(8.16 N/kg ± 0.66)(P =.04)。高髋关节中心技术会增加髋关节的负荷,限制其运动范围。
在单侧 THA 的 DDH 患者中,髋关节中心应尽可能重建为解剖学位置,因为高髋关节中心技术会降低植入物的存活率并增加跌倒风险,同时会增加髋关节的负荷并减少其运动范围。