Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ayancik State Hospital, Sinop, Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):3099-3105. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.063. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
Total hip arthroplasty in severe dysplasia is challenging due to diminished periacetabular bone stock and the highly placed femoral head. Although anatomical reconstruction of the hip, with required interventions such as subtrochanteric osteotomy and graft usage, is the main aim of the procedure, good long-term clinical outcomes of the high hip center technique have also been reported. Information regarding the effect of hip center placement on gait characteristics is limited; therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the differences in gait parameters between the high hip center technique and anatomical reconstruction of the hip.
Twenty patients (40 hips) with bilateral Crowe type III-IV developmental dysplasia of the hip who underwent bilateral total hip arthroplasty and completed at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Group 1 comprised 10 patients (20 hips) who underwent anatomical hip center reconstruction, while group 2 comprised 10 patients (20 hips) who underwent high hip center reconstruction. The gait characteristics of patients were examined through markers placed in certain anatomical regions, the cameras placed around, and the force plates embedded in the walking platform.
There was no significant difference in the gait characteristics according to the location of the hip rotation center. The mean temporospatial, kinematic, and kinetic values were similar between the groups. The most prominent difference was in the peak dynamic hip extension, which was lower in group 2 (-9.71° ± 7.46°) compared to group 1 (-6.80° ± 11.44°), although it was not statistically significant (P = .09).
The bilateral high hip center technique can provide similar gait characteristics as anatomical reconstruction and may be preferred in particularly difficult cases based on the surgeon's decision.
由于髋臼周围骨量减少和股骨头位置较高,严重发育不良的全髋关节置换术具有挑战性。尽管髋关节的解剖重建是手术的主要目标,需要进行转子下截骨和植骨等干预措施,但也有报道称高位髋关节技术具有良好的长期临床效果。关于髋关节中心位置对步态特征的影响的信息有限;因此,本研究旨在分析高位髋关节技术与髋关节解剖重建之间在步态参数方面的差异。
纳入 20 例(40 髋)双侧 Crowe Ⅲ-Ⅳ型发育性髋关节发育不良行双侧全髋关节置换术且随访至少 2 年的患者。组 1 包括 10 例(20 髋)行解剖髋关节中心重建的患者,组 2 包括 10 例(20 髋)行高位髋关节中心重建的患者。通过在某些解剖区域放置标记物、在周围放置摄像机和在行走平台中嵌入测力板来检查患者的步态特征。
髋关节旋转中心的位置与步态特征无显著差异。组间的时空、运动学和动力学平均值相似。最显著的差异是在动态髋关节伸展峰值方面,组 2 (-9.71°±7.46°)明显低于组 1(-6.80°±11.44°),但无统计学意义(P=0.09)。
双侧高位髋关节技术可提供与解剖重建相似的步态特征,根据外科医生的决策,在特别困难的情况下可能更倾向于使用该技术。