Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎患者的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。

Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

作者信息

Guler Nilgun Senol, Sargin Serdar, Sahin Nilay

机构信息

Department of Phisical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Balikesir University Faculty of Medicine, Balikesir, Turkey.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Balikesir University Faculty of Medicine, Balikesir, Turkey.

出版信息

North Clin Istanb. 2018 Dec 3;5(4):314-318. doi: 10.14744/nci.2017.82435. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lateral epicondylitis is a common elbow problem. Although extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is widely used in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis, its efficacy is still controversial. Moreover, the number of prospective, randomized, controlled studies in the literature is not sufficient. Here, we intend to investigate the efficacy of ESWT.

METHODS

The study was randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, and prospectively planned. Forty patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups, real ESWT (Group 1, n=20) and placebo ESWT (Group 2, n=20), in a 1: 1 randomized closed envelope manner. Patients were evaluated for Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation-Turkish Version (PRTEE-T), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and grip and pinching strengths. The evaluation were performed thrice before, at the end of treatment and 1 month after treatment. Both groups were treated with wrist splinting, ice treatment, and rest.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between sex and dominant hand in both groups. There was no significant difference in the grasp and pinching strength between the measurements of the groups themselves (p>0.05). When examined in terms of VAS scores, only significant changes were found in the actual ESWT group (p<0.05). According to the PRTEE-T scores, both groups showed significant changes (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between post-treatment and control measures in the grip and pinching power between groups, VAS and PRTEE-T scores before treatment (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although pain and functional improvement were more prominent in our patients treated with ESWT than placebo, no statistically significant results were found.

摘要

目的

外侧上髁炎是一种常见的肘部问题。尽管体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)广泛用于外侧上髁炎的治疗,但其疗效仍存在争议。此外,文献中前瞻性、随机、对照研究的数量不足。在此,我们旨在研究ESWT的疗效。

方法

本研究为随机、安慰剂对照、双盲且前瞻性规划的研究。40例符合纳入标准的患者以1:1随机封闭信封方式分为两组,即实际ESWT组(第1组,n = 20)和安慰剂ESWT组(第2组,n = 20)。对患者进行患者自评网球肘评估-土耳其版(PRTEE-T)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分以及握力和捏力评估。在治疗前、治疗结束时及治疗后1个月进行三次评估。两组均接受手腕夹板固定、冰敷治疗及休息。

结果

两组在性别和优势手方面无统计学差异。两组自身测量的握力和捏力之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。从VAS评分来看,仅实际ESWT组有显著变化(p<0.05)。根据PRTEE-T评分,两组均有显著变化(p<0.05)。两组之间治疗后与对照测量的握力和捏力、治疗前VAS和PRTEE-T评分之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

尽管接受ESWT治疗的患者在疼痛和功能改善方面比接受安慰剂治疗的患者更显著,但未发现统计学上的显著结果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Shock wave therapy for lateral elbow pain.冲击波疗法治疗外侧肘部疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD003524. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003524.pub2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验